John Edward brings psychic medium show to Australia | Sunrise
Psychic medium John Edward returns to Australia with a thrilling live tour based on Crossing Over. He explains how he controls his psychic abilities, offers practical advice for developing intuition, and addresses skeptics.
John Edwards
los angeles
Player
Show notes
World-renowned psychic medium John Edward joins the Sunrise studio to discuss returning to Australia for a national tour. He shares what Australian audiences can expect from his live shows, which recreate the format of his hit television series Crossing Over.
During the conversation, Edward explains how he manages to turn his psychic abilities on and off to prevent emotional exhaustion and respect privacy. He also offers advice for individuals looking to develop their own intuition, encouraging them to treat it like a muscle through dedicated study and practice.
Edward also addresses skeptics, discusses an impromptu reading with Sunrise nutritionist Sarah DiLorenzo, and shares red flags for identifying unauthentic mediumship. He reminds attendees to keep an open mind and focus on the educational experience.
Key takeaways
- John Edward is touring Australia with live events based on his hit show Crossing Over.
- Mediumship abilities can be turned on and off to manage energy and preserve personal boundaries.
- Intuition should be viewed as an ability and developed like a muscle using tools such as astrology or tarot.
- Skeptics are encouraged to pay close attention during readings to observe factual and evidential information.
- Authentic mediumship focus on providing educational, evidential content rather than performative display.
Highlights
- 0:00 — John Edward welcomed back to Australia
- 0:54 — Bringing Crossing Over to live stage shows
- 1:01 — Turning psychic abilities on and off
- 1:36 — Treating intuition like a muscle
- 2:09 — Responding to skeptics and cynics
- 3:23 — Advice for audience members attending live shows
- 3:49 — Identifying red flags in mediumship
00:00:00 Welcome John Edward to Sunrise
00:00:48 Bringing Crossing Over Live to Australia
00:01:01 Controlling and Managing Psychic Energy
00:01:30 Advice for Developing Intuitive Abilities
00:02:01 Addressing Skeptics and Cynics
00:02:26 Impromptu Reading for Sarah DiLorenzo
00:03:00 What to Expect at Live Events
00:03:42 Spotting Red Flags in MediumshipWEBVTT
00:00:00.141 --> 00:00:05.040
[SPEAKER_00]<00:00:00.142> Well,<00:00:00.143> our<00:00:00.144> next<00:00:00.145> guest<00:00:00.146> is<00:00:00.147> one<00:00:00.148> of<00:00:00.149> the<00:00:00.150> most<00:00:00.151> in-demand<00:00:00.152> psychic<00:00:00.153> mediums<00:00:00.154> in<00:00:00.155> the<00:00:00.156> world.
00:00:05.040 --> 00:00:09.320
[SPEAKER_00]<00:00:05.041> John<00:00:05.042> Edward<00:00:05.043> came<00:00:05.044> to<00:00:05.045> fame<00:00:05.046> on<00:00:05.047> his<00:00:05.048> hit<00:00:05.049> TV<00:00:05.050> show,<00:00:05.051> Crossing<00:00:05.052> Over.
00:00:09.320 --> 00:00:13.523
[SPEAKER_00]<00:00:09.321> He<00:00:09.322> now<00:00:09.323> travels<00:00:09.324> the<00:00:09.325> world<00:00:09.326> helping<00:00:09.327> people<00:00:09.328> find<00:00:09.329> comfort<00:00:09.330> and<00:00:09.331> closure
00:00:13.523 --> 00:00:22.324
[SPEAKER_00]<00:00:13.692> with<00:00:13.861> the<00:00:14.030> connection<00:00:14.199> to<00:00:14.369> the<00:00:14.538> other<00:00:14.707> side.<00:00:14.876> [SPEAKER_02]<00:00:15.045> And<00:00:15.214> now,<00:00:15.383> John<00:00:15.552> Edward<00:00:15.722> has<00:00:15.891> returned<00:00:16.060> to<00:00:16.229> Australia,<00:00:16.398> [SPEAKER_02]<00:00:16.567> touring<00:00:16.736> the<00:00:16.905> country<00:00:17.074> with<00:00:17.244> his<00:00:17.413> thrilling<00:00:17.582> new<00:00:17.751> live<00:00:17.920> show.
00:00:22.324 --> 00:00:27.019
[SPEAKER_02]<00:00:22.455> And<00:00:22.586> John<00:00:22.717> joins<00:00:22.847> us<00:00:22.978> live<00:00:23.109> in<00:00:23.240> the<00:00:23.371> studio<00:00:23.502> this<00:00:23.632> morning.<00:00:23.763> [SPEAKER_02]<00:00:23.894> Good<00:00:24.025> morning<00:00:24.156> and<00:00:24.287> welcome<00:00:24.417> back<00:00:24.548> to<00:00:24.679> Australia.
00:00:27.019 --> 00:00:31.140
[SPEAKER_02]<00:00:27.103> Thank<00:00:27.188> you.<00:00:27.272> [SPEAKER_02]<00:00:27.357> I<00:00:27.441> feel<00:00:27.526> like<00:00:27.610> you've<00:00:27.695> spent<00:00:27.779> a<00:00:27.864> bit<00:00:27.948> of<00:00:28.033> time<00:00:28.117> here<00:00:28.202> over<00:00:28.286> the<00:00:28.371> journey.<00:00:28.455> [SPEAKER_01]<00:00:28.540> I've<00:00:28.624> spent<00:00:28.709> as<00:00:28.793> much<00:00:28.878> time<00:00:28.962> here<00:00:29.047> as<00:00:29.131> I<00:00:29.216> possibly<00:00:29.300> can.
00:00:31.140 --> 00:00:36.180
[SPEAKER_02]<00:00:31.233> Yeah,<00:00:31.327> how<00:00:31.420> do<00:00:31.513> Aussie<00:00:31.607> audiences<00:00:31.700> go<00:00:31.793> for<00:00:31.887> you?<00:00:31.980> [SPEAKER_02]<00:00:32.073> Is<00:00:32.167> there<00:00:32.260> a<00:00:32.353> different<00:00:32.447> trick<00:00:32.540> to<00:00:32.633> it,<00:00:32.727> a<00:00:32.820> knack<00:00:32.913> for<00:00:33.007> reading,<00:00:33.100> or<00:00:33.193> are<00:00:33.287> they<00:00:33.380> just...
00:00:36.180 --> 00:00:39.902
[SPEAKER_02]<00:00:36.336> I<00:00:36.492> just<00:00:36.648> think<00:00:36.804> their<00:00:36.960> energy<00:00:37.116> is<00:00:37.272> amazing.<00:00:37.427> [SPEAKER_02]<00:00:37.583> Yeah.<00:00:37.739> [SPEAKER_02]<00:00:37.895> It's<00:00:38.051> a<00:00:38.207> good<00:00:38.363> synastry.
00:00:39.902 --> 00:00:43.780
[SPEAKER_00]<00:00:39.972> Is<00:00:40.042> that<00:00:40.112> why<00:00:40.181> you<00:00:40.251> keep<00:00:40.321> coming<00:00:40.391> back?<00:00:40.461> [SPEAKER_00]<00:00:40.531> And<00:00:40.601> we<00:00:40.671> understand<00:00:40.740> you're<00:00:40.810> going<00:00:40.880> to<00:00:40.950> be<00:00:41.020> here<00:00:41.090> for<00:00:41.160> a<00:00:41.229> bit<00:00:41.299> longer<00:00:41.369> this<00:00:41.439> time.
00:00:43.780 --> 00:00:47.320
[SPEAKER_01]<00:00:43.824> A<00:00:43.868> little<00:00:43.912> bit,<00:00:43.956> a<00:00:44.000> little<00:00:44.044> bit.<00:00:44.088> [SPEAKER_01]<00:00:44.132> I<00:00:44.176> added<00:00:44.220> some<00:00:44.263> additional<00:00:44.307> events<00:00:44.351> in<00:00:44.395> and<00:00:44.439> travelling<00:00:44.483> a<00:00:44.527> little<00:00:44.571> bit<00:00:44.615> more<00:00:44.659> around
00:00:47.320 --> 00:00:50.441
[SPEAKER_01]<00:00:47.445> so<00:00:47.571> I'm<00:00:47.696> excited<00:00:47.821> to<00:00:47.946> be<00:00:48.072> back.<00:00:48.197> [SPEAKER_02]<00:00:48.322> Right,<00:00:48.447> so<00:00:48.573> you've<00:00:48.698> got<00:00:48.823> these<00:00:48.948> live<00:00:49.074> shows.<00:00:49.199> [SPEAKER_02]<00:00:49.324> Tell<00:00:49.449> us<00:00:49.575> about<00:00:49.700> them.
00:00:50.441 --> 00:00:54.000
[SPEAKER_02]<00:00:50.483> What<00:00:50.526> are<00:00:50.568> they?<00:00:50.610> [SPEAKER_02]<00:00:50.653> Are<00:00:50.695> they<00:00:50.737> the<00:00:50.780> traditional<00:00:50.822> John<00:00:50.865> Edward<00:00:50.907> show<00:00:50.949> that<00:00:50.992> we've<00:00:51.034> all<00:00:51.076> come<00:00:51.119> to<00:00:51.161> know?
00:00:54.000 --> 00:00:56.905
[SPEAKER_01]<00:00:54.001> When<00:00:54.002> people<00:00:54.003> think<00:00:54.004> about<00:00:54.005> me,<00:00:54.006> they<00:00:54.007> think<00:00:54.008> about<00:00:54.009> a<00:00:54.010> show<00:00:54.011> called<00:00:54.012> Crossing<00:00:54.013> Over.
00:00:56.905 --> 00:01:02.061
[SPEAKER_01]<00:00:57.038> Yes.<00:00:57.171> [SPEAKER_01]<00:00:57.303> Because<00:00:57.436> that<00:00:57.569> show<00:00:57.702> was<00:00:57.834> based<00:00:57.967> on<00:00:58.100> my<00:00:58.233> live<00:00:58.365> events.<00:00:58.498> [SPEAKER_01]<00:00:58.631> So<00:00:58.764> this<00:00:58.896> is<00:00:59.029> basically<00:00:59.162> Crossing<00:00:59.295> Over,<00:00:59.427> but<00:00:59.560> live.
00:01:02.061 --> 00:01:04.942
[SPEAKER_00]<00:01:02.157> John,<00:01:02.254> do<00:01:02.350> you<00:01:02.446> turn<00:01:02.542> it<00:01:02.639> on<00:01:02.735> and<00:01:02.831> off?<00:01:02.927> [SPEAKER_01]<00:01:03.024> I<00:01:03.120> do<00:01:03.216> turn<00:01:03.312> it<00:01:03.409> on<00:01:03.505> and<00:01:03.601> off.
00:01:04.942 --> 00:01:09.579
[SPEAKER_01]<00:01:05.027> I<00:01:05.111> have<00:01:05.196> to.<00:01:05.281> [SPEAKER_01]<00:01:05.365> Otherwise,<00:01:05.450> I<00:01:05.535> would<00:01:05.619> be<00:01:05.704> walking<00:01:05.788> around<00:01:05.873> picking<00:01:05.958> up<00:01:06.042> people's<00:01:06.127> energies<00:01:06.212> and<00:01:06.296> their<00:01:06.381> feelings.
00:01:09.579 --> 00:01:12.280
[SPEAKER_01]<00:01:09.580> And<00:01:09.581> if<00:01:09.582> somebody<00:01:09.583> just<00:01:09.584> had<00:01:09.585> an<00:01:09.586> argument<00:01:09.587> with<00:01:09.588> their<00:01:09.589> spouse,<00:01:09.590> I<00:01:09.591> might<00:01:09.592> feel<00:01:09.593> that.
00:01:12.280 --> 00:01:16.001
[SPEAKER_01]<00:01:12.281> Or<00:01:12.282> I<00:01:12.283> don't<00:01:12.284> think<00:01:12.285> it's<00:01:12.286> appropriate<00:01:12.287> to<00:01:12.288> enter<00:01:12.289> someone's<00:01:12.290> vibration<00:01:12.291> without<00:01:12.292> their<00:01:12.293> consent.
00:01:16.001 --> 00:01:19.865
[SPEAKER_01]<00:01:16.002> So<00:01:16.003> if<00:01:16.004> I'm<00:01:16.005> always<00:01:16.006> open,<00:01:16.007> that<00:01:16.008> means<00:01:16.009> I<00:01:16.010> can<00:01:16.011> connect<00:01:16.012> with<00:01:16.013> someone's<00:01:16.014> folks.
00:01:19.865 --> 00:01:23.379
[SPEAKER_01]<00:01:20.045> Not<00:01:20.225> appropriate<00:01:20.405> to<00:01:20.584> do.<00:01:20.764> [SPEAKER_01]<00:01:20.944> Is<00:01:21.124> that<00:01:21.304> an<00:01:21.484> exhausting<00:01:21.664> thing<00:01:21.844> to<00:01:22.024> do?<00:01:22.203> [SPEAKER_01]<00:01:22.383> It<00:01:22.563> can<00:01:22.743> be.
00:01:23.379 --> 00:01:26.760
[SPEAKER_01]<00:01:23.505> Yeah.<00:01:23.632> [SPEAKER_01]<00:01:23.758> It<00:01:23.884> could<00:01:24.011> be<00:01:24.137> the<00:01:24.263> opposite<00:01:24.390> as<00:01:24.516> well.<00:01:24.642> [SPEAKER_01]<00:01:24.768> It<00:01:24.895> could<00:01:25.021> be<00:01:25.147> kind<00:01:25.274> of<00:01:25.400> energizing.
00:01:26.760 --> 00:01:33.219
[SPEAKER_01]<00:01:26.837> Okay.<00:01:26.914> [SPEAKER_00]<00:01:26.992> So,<00:01:27.069> if<00:01:27.146> there's<00:01:27.223> someone<00:01:27.300> at<00:01:27.378> home<00:01:27.455> that<00:01:27.532> might<00:01:27.609> feel<00:01:27.686> as<00:01:27.763> if<00:01:27.841> they<00:01:27.918> could<00:01:27.995> have<00:01:28.072> a<00:01:28.149> gift,<00:01:28.227> you<00:01:28.304> know,<00:01:28.381> and
00:01:33.219 --> 00:01:36.661
[SPEAKER_00]<00:01:33.220> they<00:01:33.221> think<00:01:33.222> that<00:01:33.223> they<00:01:33.224> are<00:01:33.225> able<00:01:33.226> to<00:01:33.227> tap<00:01:33.228> in,<00:01:33.229> what<00:01:33.230> would<00:01:33.231> your<00:01:33.232> advice<00:01:33.233> be<00:01:33.234> to<00:01:33.235> them?
00:01:36.661 --> 00:01:40.600
[SPEAKER_01]<00:01:36.727> I<00:01:36.792> would<00:01:36.858> say<00:01:36.924> lose<00:01:36.989> the<00:01:37.055> word<00:01:37.121> gift.<00:01:37.186> [SPEAKER_01]<00:01:37.252> Look<00:01:37.318> at<00:01:37.383> it<00:01:37.449> as<00:01:37.515> an<00:01:37.580> ability<00:01:37.646> and<00:01:37.712> treat<00:01:37.777> it<00:01:37.843> like<00:01:37.909> it's<00:01:37.974> a<00:01:38.040> muscle.
00:01:40.600 --> 00:01:44.480
[SPEAKER_01]<00:01:40.703> The<00:01:40.806> more<00:01:40.909> you<00:01:41.013> work<00:01:41.116> at<00:01:41.219> something,<00:01:41.322> the<00:01:41.425> more<00:01:41.528> you<00:01:41.632> can<00:01:41.735> develop<00:01:41.838> it.<00:01:41.941> [SPEAKER_01]<00:01:42.044> And<00:01:42.147> different<00:01:42.251> people<00:01:42.354> will<00:01:42.457> develop<00:01:42.560> differently.
00:01:44.480 --> 00:01:48.219
[SPEAKER_01]<00:01:44.481> So<00:01:44.482> there's<00:01:44.483> a<00:01:44.484> ton<00:01:44.485> of<00:01:44.486> material,<00:01:44.487> ton<00:01:44.488> of<00:01:44.489> books<00:01:44.490> that<00:01:44.491> people<00:01:44.492> could<00:01:44.493> learn<00:01:44.494> about.
00:01:48.219 --> 00:01:51.742
[SPEAKER_01]<00:01:48.220> So<00:01:48.221> the<00:01:48.222> more<00:01:48.223> knowledge<00:01:48.224> you<00:01:48.225> get<00:01:48.226> about<00:01:48.227> a<00:01:48.228> subject,<00:01:48.229> the<00:01:48.230> more<00:01:48.231> you're<00:01:48.232> going<00:01:48.233> to<00:01:48.234> be<00:01:48.235> able<00:01:48.236> to<00:01:48.237> kind<00:01:48.238> of
00:01:51.742 --> 00:01:58.081
[SPEAKER_01]<00:01:51.817> recognize<00:01:51.893> it<00:01:51.968> as<00:01:52.043> it's<00:01:52.119> happening.<00:01:52.194> [SPEAKER_01]<00:01:52.270> And<00:01:52.345> then<00:01:52.420> I<00:01:52.496> recommend<00:01:52.571> people<00:01:52.646> learn<00:01:52.722> a<00:01:52.797> tool<00:01:52.872> like<00:01:52.948> astrology<00:01:53.023> or<00:01:53.099> numerology<00:01:53.174> or<00:01:53.249> working<00:01:53.325> with<00:01:53.400> symbolism
00:01:58.081 --> 00:02:01.700
[SPEAKER_01]<00:01:58.082> like<00:01:58.083> the<00:01:58.084> tarot<00:01:58.085> to<00:01:58.086> be<00:01:58.087> able<00:01:58.088> to<00:01:58.089> help<00:01:58.090> open<00:01:58.091> and<00:01:58.092> unlock<00:01:58.093> the<00:01:58.094> intuition.
00:02:01.700 --> 00:02:05.480
[SPEAKER_02]<00:02:01.701> John,<00:02:01.702> what<00:02:01.703> do<00:02:01.704> you<00:02:01.705> say<00:02:01.706> to<00:02:01.707> the<00:02:01.708> skeptics<00:02:01.709> out<00:02:01.710> there<00:02:01.711> who<00:02:01.712> look<00:02:01.713> at<00:02:01.714> you<00:02:01.715> and<00:02:01.716> think<00:02:01.717> that<00:02:01.718> you<00:02:01.719> might
00:02:05.480 --> 00:02:09.481
[SPEAKER_02]<00:02:05.481> be<00:02:05.482> a<00:02:05.483> bit<00:02:05.484> of<00:02:05.485> a<00:02:05.486> charlatan,<00:02:05.487> you<00:02:05.488> know,<00:02:05.489> that<00:02:05.490> you're<00:02:05.491> out<00:02:05.492> here<00:02:05.493> taking<00:02:05.494> their<00:02:05.495> money,<00:02:05.496> duping<00:02:05.497> the<00:02:05.498> good
00:02:09.481 --> 00:02:14.102
[SPEAKER_02]<00:02:09.575> people<00:02:09.669> of<00:02:09.762> Australia?<00:02:09.856> [SPEAKER_01]<00:02:09.950> I<00:02:10.044> tell<00:02:10.137> them<00:02:10.231> to<00:02:10.325> pay<00:02:10.419> attention<00:02:10.512> and<00:02:10.606> watch<00:02:10.700> closely.
00:02:14.102 --> 00:02:16.067
[SPEAKER_01]<00:02:14.317> And<00:02:14.531> that<00:02:14.746> answers<00:02:14.960> their<00:02:15.175> questions?<00:02:15.389> [SPEAKER_01]<00:02:15.604> Usually.
00:02:16.067 --> 00:02:19.280
[SPEAKER_01]<00:02:16.087> Yeah.<00:02:16.106> [SPEAKER_01]<00:02:16.126> Because<00:02:16.145> then<00:02:16.165> it<00:02:16.184> shows<00:02:16.204> that<00:02:16.223> they're<00:02:16.243> more<00:02:16.262> of<00:02:16.282> a<00:02:16.301> cynic<00:02:16.320> rather<00:02:16.340> than<00:02:16.360> a<00:02:16.379> skeptic.
00:02:19.280 --> 00:02:22.466
[SPEAKER_01]<00:02:19.281> Because<00:02:19.282> if<00:02:19.283> somebody's<00:02:19.284> skeptical,<00:02:19.285> it<00:02:19.286> means<00:02:19.287> I'm<00:02:19.288> just<00:02:19.289> looking<00:02:19.290> to<00:02:19.291> see<00:02:19.292> validation.
00:02:22.466 --> 00:02:28.659
[SPEAKER_01]<00:02:22.535> I<00:02:22.604> provide<00:02:22.674> that.<00:02:22.743> [SPEAKER_00]<00:02:22.812> We<00:02:22.881> understand<00:02:22.950> that<00:02:23.020> you<00:02:23.089> just<00:02:23.158> did<00:02:23.227> a<00:02:23.297> reading<00:02:23.366> for<00:02:23.435> Sarah<00:02:23.504> DiLorenzo,<00:02:23.573> our<00:02:23.643> most<00:02:23.712> beloved<00:02:23.781> nutritionist.
00:02:28.659 --> 00:02:32.539
[SPEAKER_01]<00:02:28.813> A<00:02:28.967> little<00:02:29.121> impromptu<00:02:29.275> thing<00:02:29.429> that<00:02:29.583> happened,<00:02:29.738> yes.<00:02:29.892> [SPEAKER_00]<00:02:30.046> But<00:02:30.200> she<00:02:30.354> left<00:02:30.508> in<00:02:30.662> tears.
00:02:32.539 --> 00:02:35.782
[SPEAKER_00]<00:02:32.540> Is<00:02:32.541> that<00:02:32.542> the<00:02:32.543> response<00:02:32.544> that<00:02:32.545> you<00:02:32.546> often<00:02:32.547> get?
00:02:35.782 --> 00:02:38.543
[SPEAKER_01]<00:02:35.783> I<00:02:35.784> don't<00:02:35.785> know<00:02:35.786> if<00:02:35.787> it<00:02:35.788> was<00:02:35.789> in<00:02:35.790> tears<00:02:35.791> and<00:02:35.792> tears.
00:02:38.543 --> 00:02:42.381
[SPEAKER_01]<00:02:38.544> I<00:02:38.545> get<00:02:38.546> a<00:02:38.547> response,<00:02:38.548> and<00:02:38.549> hopefully<00:02:38.550> the<00:02:38.551> response<00:02:38.552> is<00:02:38.553> one<00:02:38.554> that<00:02:38.555> they<00:02:38.556> can<00:02:38.557> validate<00:02:38.558> the<00:02:38.559> information
00:02:42.381 --> 00:02:45.820
[SPEAKER_01]<00:02:42.382> that<00:02:42.383> it<00:02:42.384> helps<00:02:42.385> them<00:02:42.386> on<00:02:42.387> their<00:02:42.388> journey<00:02:42.389> wherever<00:02:42.390> I'm<00:02:42.391> meeting<00:02:42.392> them<00:02:42.393> at<00:02:42.394> the<00:02:42.395> intersection<00:02:42.396> of<00:02:42.397> me
00:02:45.820 --> 00:02:51.599
[SPEAKER_01]<00:02:45.889> and<00:02:45.959> the<00:02:46.028> universe.<00:02:46.098> [SPEAKER_02]<00:02:46.167> Right.<00:02:46.237> [SPEAKER_02]<00:02:46.306> So<00:02:46.375> without<00:02:46.445> giving<00:02:46.514> anything<00:02:46.584> away,<00:02:46.653> Sarah,<00:02:46.722> but<00:02:46.792> you<00:02:46.861> said<00:02:46.931> something,<00:02:47.000> you<00:02:47.070> saw<00:02:47.139> something?
00:02:51.599 --> 00:02:56.103
[SPEAKER_02]<00:02:51.600> We<00:02:51.601> were<00:02:51.602> just<00:02:51.603> having<00:02:51.604> a<00:02:51.605> casual<00:02:51.606> conversation<00:02:51.607> and<00:02:51.608> information;<00:02:51.609> I<00:02:51.610> would<00:02:51.611> leave<00:02:51.612> it<00:02:51.613> to<00:02:51.614> her<00:02:51.615> to
00:02:56.103 --> 00:03:00.201
[SPEAKER_02]<00:02:56.240> say<00:02:56.377> what<00:02:56.515> happened.<00:02:56.652> [SPEAKER_02]<00:02:56.789> Oh,<00:02:56.926> okay.<00:02:57.064> [SPEAKER_02]<00:02:57.201> We'll<00:02:57.338> have<00:02:57.475> to<00:02:57.612> ask<00:02:57.750> her<00:02:57.887> about<00:02:58.024> that<00:02:58.161> later<00:02:58.298> on<00:02:58.436> as<00:02:58.573> well.<00:02:58.710> [SPEAKER_02]<00:02:58.847> That<00:02:58.985> is<00:02:59.122> so<00:02:59.259> exciting.
00:03:00.201 --> 00:03:03.587
[SPEAKER_02]<00:03:00.304> Now,<00:03:00.407> John,<00:03:00.510> you've<00:03:00.613> come<00:03:00.716> to<00:03:00.819> Australia.<00:03:00.922> [SPEAKER_02]<00:03:01.025> Whereabouts<00:03:01.128> are<00:03:01.232> you<00:03:01.335> touring?<00:03:01.438> [SPEAKER_02]<00:03:01.541> Are<00:03:01.644> you<00:03:01.747> going<00:03:01.850> right<00:03:01.953> around<00:03:02.056> the<00:03:02.159> country?
00:03:03.587 --> 00:03:07.503
[SPEAKER_02]<00:03:03.634> All<00:03:03.680> over.<00:03:03.727> [SPEAKER_02]<00:03:03.773> Okay.<00:03:03.820> [SPEAKER_02]<00:03:03.867> All<00:03:03.913> the<00:03:03.960> capital<00:03:04.006> cities<00:03:04.053> and<00:03:04.099> some<00:03:04.146> of<00:03:04.193> the<00:03:04.239> more<00:03:04.286> regional<00:03:04.332> as<00:03:04.379> well.
00:03:07.503 --> 00:03:11.699
[SPEAKER_00]<00:03:07.504> Look,<00:03:07.505> if<00:03:07.506> someone<00:03:07.507> is<00:03:07.508> coming<00:03:07.509> to<00:03:07.510> your<00:03:07.511> show,<00:03:07.512> they<00:03:07.513> really,<00:03:07.514> really<00:03:07.515> want<00:03:07.516> to<00:03:07.517> get<00:03:07.518> read.
00:03:11.699 --> 00:03:15.741
[SPEAKER_00]<00:03:11.700> And<00:03:11.701> I<00:03:11.702> assume<00:03:11.703> that<00:03:11.704> a<00:03:11.705> lot<00:03:11.706> of<00:03:11.707> the<00:03:11.708> people<00:03:11.709> that<00:03:11.710> come<00:03:11.711> to<00:03:11.712> your<00:03:11.713> shows<00:03:11.714> really<00:03:11.715> want<00:03:11.716> to<00:03:11.717> get<00:03:11.718> read.
00:03:15.741 --> 00:03:19.062
[SPEAKER_00]<00:03:15.742> Is<00:03:15.743> there<00:03:15.744> anything<00:03:15.745> that<00:03:15.746> you<00:03:15.747> would<00:03:15.748> say<00:03:15.749> to<00:03:15.750> them<00:03:15.751> about,<00:03:15.752> you<00:03:15.753> know?
00:03:19.062 --> 00:03:25.360
[SPEAKER_01]<00:03:19.112> I<00:03:19.162> would<00:03:19.212> say<00:03:19.262> keep<00:03:19.312> an<00:03:19.362> open<00:03:19.411> mind.<00:03:19.461> [SPEAKER_01]<00:03:19.511> But<00:03:19.561> whether<00:03:19.611> it's<00:03:19.661> coming<00:03:19.711> to<00:03:19.761> the<00:03:19.811> event<00:03:19.861> or<00:03:19.911> if<00:03:19.961> it's<00:03:20.011> going<00:03:20.060> for<00:03:20.110> a<00:03:20.160> private<00:03:20.210> reading,<00:03:20.260> I<00:03:20.310> want<00:03:20.360> people
00:03:25.360 --> 00:03:30.099
[SPEAKER_01]<00:03:25.361> to<00:03:25.362> go<00:03:25.363> for<00:03:25.364> an<00:03:25.365> experience<00:03:25.366> that's<00:03:25.367> educational,<00:03:25.368> not<00:03:25.369> one<00:03:25.370> with<00:03:25.371> such<00:03:25.372> great<00:03:25.373> expectation.
00:03:30.099 --> 00:03:33.961
[SPEAKER_01]<00:03:30.100> Because<00:03:30.101> if<00:03:30.102> you<00:03:30.103> have<00:03:30.104> that<00:03:30.105> level<00:03:30.106> of<00:03:30.107> expectation,<00:03:30.108> it's<00:03:30.109> going<00:03:30.110> to<00:03:30.111> lead<00:03:30.112> to<00:03:30.113> disappointment.
00:03:33.961 --> 00:03:38.520
[SPEAKER_01]<00:03:33.962> So<00:03:33.963> come<00:03:33.964> for<00:03:33.965> the<00:03:33.966> experience<00:03:33.967> of<00:03:33.968> understanding<00:03:33.969> the<00:03:33.970> world<00:03:33.971> of<00:03:33.972> energy<00:03:33.973> so<00:03:33.974> that<00:03:33.975> I<00:03:33.976> could<00:03:33.977> help<00:03:33.978> you
00:03:38.520 --> 00:03:43.800
[SPEAKER_01]<00:03:38.612> recognize<00:03:38.704> it<00:03:38.796> when<00:03:38.888> it's<00:03:38.979> happening<00:03:39.071> in<00:03:39.163> your<00:03:39.255> everyday<00:03:39.347> life.<00:03:39.439> [SPEAKER_02]<00:03:39.531> Just<00:03:39.623> very<00:03:39.715> quickly<00:03:39.806> before<00:03:39.898> you<00:03:39.990> go<00:03:40.082> as<00:03:40.174> well,<00:03:40.266> if<00:03:40.358> people<00:03:40.450> are<00:03:40.542> talking<00:03:40.633> to<00:03:40.725> some<00:03:40.817> other<00:03:40.909> people<00:03:41.001> that
00:03:43.800 --> 00:03:47.361
[SPEAKER_02]<00:03:43.801> you<00:03:43.802> think<00:03:43.803> aren't<00:03:43.804> up<00:03:43.805> to<00:03:43.806> scratch<00:03:43.807> here,<00:03:43.808> what<00:03:43.809> are<00:03:43.810> some<00:03:43.811> red<00:03:43.812> flags<00:03:43.813> that<00:03:43.814> they<00:03:43.815> should<00:03:43.816> actually
00:03:47.361 --> 00:03:50.460
[SPEAKER_02]<00:03:47.505> look<00:03:47.650> out<00:03:47.794> for?<00:03:47.938> [SPEAKER_01]<00:03:48.083> It<00:03:48.227> should<00:03:48.372> not<00:03:48.516> be<00:03:48.660> performative.<00:03:48.805> [SPEAKER_01]<00:03:48.949> It<00:03:49.093> should<00:03:49.238> be<00:03:49.382> informational.
00:03:50.460 --> 00:03:54.643
[SPEAKER_01]<00:03:50.461> And<00:03:50.462> the<00:03:50.463> person<00:03:50.464> should<00:03:50.465> be<00:03:50.466> able<00:03:50.467> to<00:03:50.468> validate<00:03:50.469> what<00:03:50.470> it<00:03:50.471> is<00:03:50.472> they're<00:03:50.473> saying<00:03:50.474> with<00:03:50.475> factual,<00:03:50.476> evidential
00:03:54.643 --> 00:03:59.006
[SPEAKER_01]<00:03:54.806> information.<00:03:54.969> [SPEAKER_01]<00:03:55.132> Very<00:03:55.295> interesting,<00:03:55.458> John.<00:03:55.622> [SPEAKER_01]<00:03:55.785> Thanks<00:03:55.948> for<00:03:56.111> your<00:03:56.274> time<00:03:56.437> this<00:03:56.600> morning.
00:03:59.006 --> 00:04:03.860
[SPEAKER_00]<00:03:59.007> For<00:03:59.008> all<00:03:59.009> the<00:03:59.010> details<00:03:59.011> about<00:03:59.012> John<00:03:59.013> Edward's<00:03:59.014> national<00:03:59.015> tour,<00:03:59.016> you<00:03:59.017> can<00:03:59.018> head<00:03:59.019> to<00:03:59.020> John<00:03:59.021> Edward's<00:03:59.022> website.
00:04:03.860 --> 00:04:07.659
[SPEAKER_00]<00:04:03.861> You're<00:04:03.862> a<00:04:03.863> busy<00:04:03.864> man,<00:04:03.865> John,<00:04:03.866> because<00:04:03.867> your<00:04:03.868> newest<00:04:03.869> book,<00:04:03.870> Chasing<00:04:03.871> Evil,<00:04:03.872> is<00:04:03.873> also<00:04:03.874> out<00:04:03.875> now.
00:04:07.659 --> 00:04:10.900
[SPEAKER_00]<00:04:07.783> So<00:04:07.907> be<00:04:08.031> sure<00:04:08.155> to<00:04:08.279> grab<00:04:08.404> a<00:04:08.528> copy.<00:04:08.652> [SPEAKER_00]<00:04:08.776> Thanks,<00:04:08.900> John.
Chapters
No chapters for this episode.
Transcript
No transcript for this episode.
No matching lines.
Hosts & Guests
John Edwards
John Edward is an author and television personality best known for his work as a psychic medium. He hosted the television shows Crossing Over with John Edward and John Edward Cross Country. He is, in 2026, the world most well known psychic medium.
View profile
Angie Li
Hi! I'm a writer & researcher obsessed with spiritually transformative experiences! I share the best resources on NDE's, psychic mediumship, past life memories & afterlife evidence for beginners, believers & the curious but not yet convinced.
View profileComments
Up next
All episodesVideo Where Two Worlds Meet with Gordon Smith | The Wisdom of Jacob’s Ladder EP80
UK's most accurate medium Gordon Smith joins Jacob Cooper to explore grief, memory, and the spirit world, sharing profound personal stories and teaching listeners how to become their own medium by turning inward toward the divine spark within.
Video She Died 3 Times and Was Shown the Truth About Who We Are (Plus Shocking Live Mediumship Demo!!)..
Discover profound spiritual insights in this episode as a guest shares her near-death story of dying three times and experiencing the truth of who we are, followed by a live mediumship demo.
Video REAL Ghost Encounter: A Teenage Ghost Showed Up In My Living Room
Malaurie connects with the ghost of a teenage soccer player in her living room, helping him process his untimely death, pass along final messages to his family, and peacefully cross over into the light.