Why do some remember a previous life but others can't

Gordon Smith explores the intriguing question of why some individuals retain memories of their past lives while others do not. Using a computer analogy, he explains that unresolved experiences or troublesome programs from a previous existence may remain open, carrying over into a new life to be properly processed and closed down.

He references the extensive research of pioneers like Dr. Raymond Moody and Dr. Ian Stevenson, who documented numerous case studies on past life recall. Ultimately, Smith suggests that these memories, whether challenging or exceptionally positive, serve as tools for spiritual growth and learning in our current lifetime.

Key takeaways

• Past life memories can be thought of as unresolved computer programs that have not been properly shut down.
• The purpose of remembering previous lives is often to resolve, grow from, and ultimately dissolve these lingering experiences.
• Researchers like Dr. Raymond Moody and Dr. Ian Stevenson have compiled extensive case studies on past life recall.
• Unresolved memories eventually need to dissolve back into the ether or the Akashic records.
• Not all past life memories are negative; some exceptionally good experiences are brought forward to encourage positive actions.

Highlights

• 0:18 — The computer analogy of consciousness
• 1:07 — The purpose of remembering past lives
• 1:25 — Research by Dr. Raymond Moody and Dr. Ian Stevenson
• 2:07 — Utilizing positive memories in the present life

00:00:00 Understanding Past Life Recall
00:00:18 The Computer Analogy of Consciousness
00:00:50 Carrying Leftover Programs to New Lives
00:01:25 Researching Past Life Case Studies
00:01:54 Closing Programs and Akashic Records
00:02:07 Positive Memories from Previous Lives

WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:05.760
Why<00:00:00.240> do<00:00:00.440> some<00:00:00.720> people<00:00:01.600> remember<00:00:02.080> a<00:00:02.160> previous<00:00:02.800> life,<00:00:03.960> but<00:00:04.160> others<00:00:04.440> can't?

00:00:05.760 --> 00:00:15.240
Um,<00:00:07.800> well,<00:00:09.440> you<00:00:09.560> would<00:00:09.680> have<00:00:09.880> to<00:00:10.000> look<00:00:10.200> at<00:00:10.280> those<00:00:10.600> who<00:00:10.760> have<00:00:11.080> researched<00:00:13.000> past<00:00:13.360> life<00:00:13.640> recall<00:00:14.880> to

00:00:15.240 --> 00:00:18.440
get<00:00:15.480> a<00:00:15.560> further<00:00:16.640> or<00:00:16.840> deeper<00:00:17.320> insight<00:00:17.840> into<00:00:18.160> that.

00:00:18.440 --> 00:00:27.160
My<00:00:18.600> own<00:00:19.000> understanding<00:00:19.760> would<00:00:20.000> be<00:00:20.160> quite<00:00:20.440> simply<00:00:20.800> like<00:00:22.440> if<00:00:22.640> our<00:00:22.920> consciousness,<00:00:24.200> our<00:00:24.520> awareness<00:00:25.680> from<00:00:26.120> this<00:00:26.360> life<00:00:27.000> as

00:00:27.160 --> 00:00:35.840
Gordon,<00:00:28.520> if<00:00:28.760> there's<00:00:29.600> moments<00:00:30.160> over<00:00:30.480> that<00:00:31.280> were<00:00:31.400> not<00:00:31.560> completely<00:00:32.480> understood<00:00:33.560> or<00:00:33.760> that<00:00:34.000> stained<00:00:35.720> the

00:00:35.840 --> 00:00:42.120
consciousness<00:00:36.520> in<00:00:36.640> a<00:00:36.680> way<00:00:36.880> because<00:00:37.560> they<00:00:37.760> were<00:00:37.960> troublesome,<00:00:39.480> then<00:00:40.040> maybe<00:00:40.320> those<00:00:40.560> programs<00:00:41.320> would<00:00:41.480> be<00:00:41.600> running.

00:00:42.120 --> 00:00:50.440
Not<00:00:42.440> the<00:00:42.560> spirit<00:00:43.080> of<00:00:43.280> Gordon,<00:00:43.760> but<00:00:43.920> those<00:00:44.160> programs<00:00:45.400> had<00:00:45.600> not<00:00:45.840> been<00:00:46.000> shut<00:00:46.320> down,<00:00:46.560> if<00:00:46.680> you<00:00:46.800> look<00:00:46.960> at<00:00:47.080> it<00:00:47.720> like<00:00:47.920> a<00:00:48.000> computer<00:00:48.480> analogy,<00:00:49.320> that<00:00:50.240> so

00:00:50.440 --> 00:00:55.960
I<00:00:50.520> come<00:00:50.800> back<00:00:51.160> then<00:00:51.920> as<00:00:52.360> another<00:00:52.720> person<00:00:53.440> as<00:00:53.640> John<00:00:54.080> Smith,<00:00:54.680> not<00:00:54.880> Gordon<00:00:55.240> Smith.

00:00:55.960 --> 00:01:04.519
I<00:00:56.080> come<00:00:56.200> back<00:00:56.400> as<00:00:56.520> John<00:00:56.840> Smith<00:00:57.400> and,<00:00:58.000> um,<00:00:59.120> I<00:00:59.360> bring<00:00:59.760> with<00:01:00.080> me<00:01:01.600> episodes<00:01:02.400> of<00:01:02.840> the<00:01:02.920> Gordon<00:01:03.240> Smith<00:01:03.520> life<00:01:03.800> that<00:01:04.199> need

00:01:04.519 --> 00:01:07.440
to<00:01:04.879> really<00:01:05.239> be<00:01:05.760> closed<00:01:06.160> down.

00:01:07.440 --> 00:01:10.320
So<00:01:08.080> as<00:01:08.240> John<00:01:08.480> Smith,<00:01:08.760> I<00:01:08.840> may<00:01:09.000> feel<00:01:09.280> them.

00:01:10.320 --> 00:01:16.920
I<00:01:10.560> may<00:01:10.760> remember<00:01:11.240> parts<00:01:11.600> of<00:01:11.720> it.<00:01:12.520> Um,<00:01:13.240> but<00:01:13.400> there's<00:01:13.520> a<00:01:13.560> reason<00:01:13.880> for<00:01:14.000> that,<00:01:14.720> and<00:01:14.840> that<00:01:15.080> is<00:01:15.240> to<00:01:15.400> shut<00:01:15.680> them<00:01:15.800> down.

00:01:16.920 --> 00:01:25.800
So<00:01:17.240> you<00:01:17.360> learn<00:01:17.680> to<00:01:17.840> either<00:01:18.080> grow<00:01:18.400> from<00:01:18.760> them<00:01:19.160> and<00:01:19.320> then<00:01:19.800> they<00:01:19.920> disappear<00:01:20.480> and<00:01:20.600> dissolve,<00:01:21.560> or<00:01:22.000> you<00:01:22.240> learn<00:01:22.680> to<00:01:22.840> close<00:01:23.160> them<00:01:23.360> down,<00:01:23.720> which<00:01:23.920> would<00:01:24.080> be<00:01:24.320> that's<00:01:24.640> not<00:01:25.280> affecting

00:01:25.800 --> 00:01:31.440
me<00:01:25.920> in<00:01:26.040> this<00:01:26.280> life.<00:01:28.000> I<00:01:28.160> would<00:01:28.360> say<00:01:28.600> you<00:01:28.760> have<00:01:28.960> to<00:01:29.080> look<00:01:29.240> at<00:01:29.480> the<00:01:29.920> research<00:01:30.600> of<00:01:30.680> people<00:01:30.920> like<00:01:31.080> Dr.

00:01:31.440 --> 00:01:38.280
Raymond<00:01:31.800> Moody<00:01:32.200> or<00:01:32.360> Dr.<00:01:32.760> Ian<00:01:33.000> Stevenson<00:01:34.080> to<00:01:34.360> maybe<00:01:34.680> gain<00:01:34.880> a<00:01:34.920> deeper<00:01:35.320> insight,<00:01:36.240> 'cause<00:01:36.440> they<00:01:36.640> have<00:01:36.880> many,<00:01:37.200> many<00:01:37.480> case<00:01:37.800> studies.

00:01:38.280 --> 00:01:47.520
I<00:01:38.400> don't.<00:01:39.520> But<00:01:39.800> I<00:01:39.960> would<00:01:40.160> say<00:01:40.880> these<00:01:41.400> are<00:01:42.040> leftovers<00:01:42.840> from<00:01:43.000> a<00:01:43.080> life<00:01:43.520> that<00:01:44.560> that<00:01:44.840> just<00:01:45.120> clung<00:01:45.640> there<00:01:45.960> and<00:01:46.120> needed<00:01:46.480> to

00:01:47.520 --> 00:01:54.160
memories<00:01:48.040> that<00:01:48.160> needed<00:01:48.480> to<00:01:48.600> dissolve<00:01:50.160> back<00:01:50.480> into<00:01:51.000> the<00:01:51.200> ether<00:01:51.800> or<00:01:51.920> the<00:01:52.240> Akashic<00:01:52.680> records<00:01:53.040> or<00:01:53.120> whatever.

00:01:54.160 --> 00:01:58.040
So<00:01:54.440> I<00:01:54.560> see<00:01:54.760> it<00:01:54.840> as<00:01:54.960> a<00:01:55.000> the<00:01:55.560> in<00:01:55.640> a<00:01:55.720> computer<00:01:56.120> that<00:01:56.320> hasn't<00:01:56.560> been<00:01:56.800> shut<00:01:57.120> down.

00:01:58.040 --> 00:02:03.840
When<00:01:58.120> a<00:01:58.160> life<00:01:58.480> finishes,<00:01:59.040> that<00:01:59.360> life<00:01:59.600> should<00:01:59.800> be<00:02:00.280> either<00:02:00.520> sent<00:02:00.880> back<00:02:01.240> to<00:02:01.360> the<00:02:01.440> hard<00:02:01.680> drive,<00:02:02.560> the<00:02:02.640> Akashic<00:02:03.040> records.

00:02:03.840 --> 00:02:07.640
So,<00:02:03.960> there<00:02:04.080> might<00:02:04.240> be<00:02:04.320> some<00:02:04.520> little<00:02:04.720> programs<00:02:05.200> that<00:02:05.320> weren't<00:02:05.640> actually<00:02:06.200> closed.

00:02:07.640 --> 00:02:15.040
Other<00:02:07.840> than<00:02:08.000> that,<00:02:09.000> um,<00:02:09.080> as<00:02:09.240> I<00:02:09.320> say,<00:02:10.399> those<00:02:10.640> who<00:02:10.800> do<00:02:11.040> remember<00:02:11.480> previous<00:02:12.000> lives<00:02:12.400> learn<00:02:12.720> something<00:02:13.160> from<00:02:13.480> it<00:02:13.720> and<00:02:13.880> don't<00:02:14.080> repeat<00:02:14.400> it<00:02:14.480> in<00:02:14.560> this<00:02:14.760> life.

00:02:15.040 --> 00:02:23.240
Or,<00:02:15.720> if<00:02:15.840> it's<00:02:15.959> a<00:02:16.000> good<00:02:16.200> thing,<00:02:16.800> use<00:02:17.280> it<00:02:17.400> in<00:02:17.480> this<00:02:17.720> life<00:02:18.320> to<00:02:18.840> encourage<00:02:19.440> and<00:02:19.640> do<00:02:20.400> good<00:02:20.640> things<00:02:20.920> with<00:02:21.080> it<00:02:21.160> that<00:02:21.320> maybe<00:02:21.600> you<00:02:21.720> couldn't<00:02:22.120> do<00:02:22.240> before.

00:02:23.240 --> 00:02:26.920
Don't<00:02:23.480> always<00:02:23.760> assume<00:02:24.120> that<00:02:24.320> things<00:02:24.600> from<00:02:24.760> a<00:02:24.800> past<00:02:25.160> life<00:02:25.680> that<00:02:25.800> people<00:02:26.040> remember<00:02:26.400> are<00:02:26.520> bad.

00:02:26.920 --> 00:02:33.200
They're<00:02:27.040> not.<00:02:27.840> Some<00:02:28.320> are<00:02:28.440> brought<00:02:28.680> back<00:02:28.920> into<00:02:29.080> this<00:02:29.280> world<00:02:29.480> because<00:02:30.240> they<00:02:30.360> were<00:02:30.440> exceptionally<00:02:31.200> good.