Etzel Cardeña - Consciousness and Life After Death?
Can consciousness survive the death of the physical body? Researcher Etzel Cardeña shares how rigorous parapsychological data and the "super-psi" hypothesis challenged his materialist assumptions about life after death.
Player
Show notes
Researcher Etzel Cardeña discusses his intellectual journey regarding the possibility of life after death. Initially holding a strictly materialist view that death is the absolute end, Cardeña explains how diving deep into serious parapsychological research and historical medium sessions opened his mind to other possibilities.
He addresses the conceptual difficulties of consciousness existing without a physical body or nervous system, criticizing overly literal or materialistic interpretations of the afterlife. Instead, he highlights well-controlled historical and modern medium sessions that have produced highly specific, non-generalizable information.
Finally, Cardeña explores the "super-psi" hypothesis, which suggests that mediums may be accessing information through telepathy or precognition with the living rather than communicating with the deceased. He reflects on the profound implications of interconnectedness, where ordinary boundaries of time, space, and self begin to dissolve.
Key takeaways
- Cardeña transitioned from a closed-minded materialist view to being open to the possibility of survival after death after reviewing rigorous parapsychological literature.
- A major conceptual challenge is understanding how consciousness could experience reality without physical sensory organs like eyes and ears.
- Highly controlled medium sessions have historically produced incredibly specific, evidential information that cannot be easily dismissed as lucky guessing.
- The "super-psi" hypothesis offers an alternative explanation, suggesting mediums tap into telepathic connections with the living rather than the dead.
- If consciousness is interconnected beyond the constraints of time and space, our ordinary sense of a separate self may be an illusion.
Highlights
- 0:25 — From Materialism to an Open Mind
- 1:27 — Consciousness Existing Without a Body
- 2:45 — Specific Evidence From Controlled Mediums
- 4:03 — The Super-Psi Alternative Hypothesis
- 5:31 — Personal Experiences and Interconnectedness
00:00:00 An Open Mind on Life After Death
00:01:27 Consciousness Without a Physical Body
00:02:45 Evidential Information From Medium Sessions
00:04:03 The Super-Psi Hypothesis Explained
00:05:00 Interconnectedness and the Sense of SelfWEBVTT
00:00:00.359 --> 00:00:08.719
Etzel,<00:00:00.960> you<00:00:01.240> have<00:00:01.520> been<00:00:02.080> a<00:00:02.399> leading<00:00:02.960> researcher<00:00:03.879> on<00:00:04.520> Altered<00:00:04.960> States<00:00:05.200> of<00:00:05.440> Consciousness,<00:00:06.200> looking<00:00:06.520> at<00:00:07.280> parapsychology<00:00:08.280> from<00:00:08.440> your
00:00:08.719 --> 00:00:17.000
whole<00:00:09.200> perspective<00:00:09.800> of<00:00:10.000> looking<00:00:10.240> at<00:00:10.480> consciousness<00:00:11.000> from<00:00:11.160> all<00:00:11.320> these<00:00:11.480> different<00:00:11.880> aspects.<00:00:12.880> Uh,<00:00:13.200> what<00:00:13.280> are<00:00:13.440> you<00:00:13.639> willing<00:00:14.040> to<00:00:14.320> say<00:00:14.839> about<00:00:15.240> the<00:00:15.839> potential<00:00:16.800> of
00:00:17.000 --> 00:00:25.160
life<00:00:17.320> after<00:00:17.680> death,<00:00:18.039> which<00:00:18.240> of<00:00:18.400> course<00:00:18.920> any<00:00:19.240> materialist<00:00:19.960> scientist<00:00:20.400> or<00:00:20.600> philosopher<00:00:21.400> would<00:00:21.640> completely<00:00:24.039> deny?<00:00:25.039> I
00:00:25.160 --> 00:00:33.480
will<00:00:25.400> tell<00:00:25.640> you<00:00:26.080> what<00:00:26.240> I<00:00:26.400> used<00:00:26.640> to<00:00:26.800> think<00:00:27.160> before<00:00:27.439> I<00:00:27.599> started<00:00:28.160> becoming<00:00:28.519> more<00:00:28.760> familiar<00:00:29.119> with<00:00:29.279> the<00:00:29.400> literature,<00:00:30.320> and<00:00:30.640> that<00:00:31.520> was:<00:00:32.520> we<00:00:32.759> die,<00:00:33.239> that's
00:00:33.480 --> 00:00:42.760
it.<00:00:33.798> It<00:00:34.117> was<00:00:34.435> wonderful<00:00:34.754> to<00:00:35.072> be<00:00:35.391> alive<00:00:35.709> if<00:00:36.028> you<00:00:36.346> had—if<00:00:36.665> you<00:00:36.983> were<00:00:37.302> lucky<00:00:37.620> enough<00:00:37.938> not<00:00:38.257> to<00:00:38.575> be<00:00:38.894> in<00:00:39.212> the<00:00:39.531> midst<00:00:39.849> of<00:00:40.168> a<00:00:40.486> war<00:00:40.805> and<00:00:41.123> being<00:00:41.442> bombarded,<00:00:41.760> so
00:00:42.760 --> 00:00:51.239
uh,<00:00:43.760> it's<00:00:44.559> wonderful.<00:00:45.559> And<00:00:45.760> then<00:00:45.960> I<00:00:46.120> started<00:00:46.480> reading<00:00:47.079> more<00:00:48.079> about<00:00:48.920> serious<00:00:49.840> research,<00:00:50.360> and<00:00:50.520> I<00:00:50.640> mean<00:00:50.879> serious
00:00:51.239 --> 00:01:00.199
of<00:00:51.480> people<00:00:52.039> who<00:00:52.320> entertain<00:00:53.239> different<00:00:54.320> hypotheses,<00:00:55.320> different<00:00:56.440> explanations,<00:00:57.440> and<00:00:57.680> looking<00:00:58.039> at<00:00:58.440> the<00:00:58.719> direct<00:00:59.280> quotation
00:01:00.199 --> 00:01:09.280
transcripts<00:01:01.160> of<00:01:01.320> some<00:01:01.519> of<00:01:01.640> the<00:01:01.760> sessions<00:01:02.160> with<00:01:02.280> some<00:01:02.440> of<00:01:02.559> the<00:01:02.719> great<00:01:03.479> mediums<00:01:04.479> in<00:01:04.840> history.<00:01:05.840> And<00:01:06.000> then<00:01:06.159> what<00:01:06.320> I<00:01:06.400> would<00:01:06.560> say<00:01:06.840> is<00:01:07.080> that<00:01:07.320> my<00:01:07.560> initial<00:01:08.200> closed
00:01:09.280 --> 00:01:17.920
door,<00:01:09.756> when<00:01:10.231> I<00:01:10.707> thought,<00:01:11.182> "Of<00:01:11.658> course<00:01:12.133> we<00:01:12.609> die,<00:01:13.084> that's<00:01:13.560> it,<00:01:14.036> we—we<00:01:14.511> just<00:01:14.987> become<00:01:15.462> humans<00:01:15.938> or<00:01:16.413> we—we<00:01:16.889> are<00:01:17.364> gone,"<00:01:17.840> I
00:01:17.920 --> 00:01:27.000
would<00:01:18.324> say<00:01:18.728> now<00:01:19.132> it's<00:01:19.536> opens—it's<00:01:19.940> somewhat<00:01:20.344> open.<00:01:20.748> Does<00:01:21.152> do<00:01:21.556> not<00:01:21.960> mean<00:01:22.364> that<00:01:22.768> I<00:01:23.172> am<00:01:23.576> convinced,<00:01:23.980> because<00:01:24.384> for<00:01:24.788> me<00:01:25.192> what<00:01:25.596> is<00:01:26.000> really
00:01:27.000 --> 00:01:35.840
difficult<00:01:27.320> is<00:01:27.520> to<00:01:28.200> try<00:01:28.520> to<00:01:28.720> get<00:01:28.920> a<00:01:29.119> sense<00:01:29.439> of,<00:01:30.159> well,<00:01:30.520> let's<00:01:30.840> assume<00:01:31.200> that<00:01:31.439> consciousness<00:01:32.119> can<00:01:32.960> continue<00:01:33.479> to<00:01:33.720> exist<00:01:34.280> without<00:01:34.600> a<00:01:34.880> body,<00:01:35.560> without
00:01:35.840 --> 00:01:44.119
a<00:01:36.000> nervous<00:01:36.399> system.<00:01:37.000> I<00:01:37.079> think<00:01:37.280> that's<00:01:38.560> possible<00:01:39.560> because<00:01:40.040> consciousness<00:01:40.560> in<00:01:40.720> parapsychology<00:01:41.439> seems<00:01:41.720> to<00:01:42.200> be<00:01:42.360> able<00:01:42.600> to<00:01:42.759> do<00:01:42.960> things<00:01:43.200> that<00:01:43.320> do<00:01:43.439> not<00:01:43.600> seem<00:01:43.759> to<00:01:43.880> be
00:01:44.119 --> 00:01:52.479
based<00:01:44.520> on<00:01:44.719> the<00:01:45.040> senses<00:01:46.040> or<00:01:46.320> in<00:01:46.840> ordinary,<00:01:47.600> let's<00:01:47.799> say,<00:01:48.040> neural<00:01:49.119> functioning.<00:01:50.119> But<00:01:50.360> then<00:01:50.920> how<00:01:51.280> do<00:01:51.520> we<00:01:51.719> experience<00:01:52.119> things
00:01:52.479 --> 00:02:01.079
without<00:01:52.840> having<00:01:53.240> eyes,<00:01:53.680> without<00:01:54.119> having<00:01:54.640> ears,<00:01:55.640> without<00:01:56.119> having<00:01:56.399> a<00:01:56.640> body?<00:01:57.280> How<00:01:57.479> do<00:01:57.640> we<00:01:57.840> place<00:01:58.320> ourselves?<00:01:59.320> Not<00:01:59.520> saying<00:01:59.960> it<00:02:00.039> is<00:02:00.240> impossible<00:02:00.840> to
00:02:01.079 --> 00:02:10.239
find<00:02:01.393> a<00:02:01.707> perspective,<00:02:02.021> but<00:02:02.334> it's<00:02:02.648> not<00:02:02.962> an<00:02:03.276> easy<00:02:03.590> one.<00:02:03.904> Certainly<00:02:04.217> I<00:02:04.531> am<00:02:04.845> not—for<00:02:05.159> there<00:02:05.473> are<00:02:05.787> some<00:02:06.101> people<00:02:06.414> who<00:02:06.728> explain<00:02:07.042> it<00:02:07.356> basically<00:02:07.670> saying,<00:02:07.984> "Oh<00:02:08.297> well,<00:02:08.611> we<00:02:08.925> just<00:02:09.239> continue."
00:02:10.239 --> 00:02:18.440
Uh,<00:02:10.606> there<00:02:10.974> was<00:02:11.341> one<00:02:11.708> book<00:02:12.075> I<00:02:12.443> reviewed—I<00:02:12.810> reviewed<00:02:13.177> it<00:02:13.544> critically—of<00:02:13.912> a<00:02:14.279> Brazilian<00:02:14.646> medium,<00:02:15.014> and<00:02:15.381> he<00:02:15.748> was<00:02:16.115> saying,<00:02:16.483> "Well,<00:02:16.850> we<00:02:17.217> die<00:02:17.584> and<00:02:17.952> then<00:02:18.319> there
00:02:18.440 --> 00:02:26.920
is<00:02:18.640> also<00:02:19.640> cinemas<00:02:20.640> in<00:02:20.840> the<00:02:21.000> afterlife,<00:02:21.920> and<00:02:22.040> there<00:02:22.160> are<00:02:22.319> restaurants."<00:02:22.959> And<00:02:23.040> I'm<00:02:23.160> thinking,<00:02:23.560> "What<00:02:23.680> do<00:02:23.760> you<00:02:23.879> mean<00:02:24.239> restaurants?<00:02:24.800> You<00:02:24.920> no<00:02:25.040> longer<00:02:25.400> have<00:02:25.519> a<00:02:25.840> body,<00:02:26.440> so
00:02:26.920 --> 00:02:36.680
and<00:02:27.475> what<00:02:28.029> are<00:02:28.584> you<00:02:29.138> doing<00:02:29.693> your<00:02:30.248> dishes<00:02:30.802> with?"<00:02:31.357> No,<00:02:31.911> this<00:02:32.466> seems<00:02:33.021> to<00:02:33.575> be<00:02:34.130> sort<00:02:34.684> of<00:02:35.239> a—a—a
00:02:36.680 --> 00:02:45.360
perversion<00:02:37.680> of<00:02:38.160> materialism<00:02:39.159> and<00:02:39.560> spiritualism<00:02:40.400> and<00:02:40.560> so<00:02:40.720> on<00:02:41.200> to<00:02:41.599> make<00:02:41.840> something<00:02:42.200> that<00:02:42.319> makes<00:02:42.640> no<00:02:43.000> sense<00:02:43.319> to<00:02:44.000> me.<00:02:45.000> Having
00:02:45.360 --> 00:02:54.519
said<00:02:45.879> that,<00:02:46.879> I<00:02:47.159> have<00:02:47.400> heard<00:02:47.920> about<00:02:48.920> sessions<00:02:49.599> of<00:02:50.280> Mrs.<00:02:50.640> Leonard,<00:02:51.159> Mrs.<00:02:51.599> Piper,<00:02:52.080> some<00:02:52.280> of<00:02:52.440> the<00:02:52.560> mediums<00:02:52.959> that<00:02:53.120> were<00:02:53.959> really
00:02:54.519 --> 00:03:02.800
very<00:02:54.850> well<00:02:55.181> controlled<00:02:55.512> earlier<00:02:55.843> on,<00:02:56.174> and<00:02:56.505> there<00:02:56.836> are<00:02:57.167> some<00:02:57.498> mediums<00:02:57.829> to<00:02:58.160> our<00:02:58.490> days<00:02:58.821> that<00:02:59.152> continue<00:02:59.483> to<00:02:59.814> have<00:03:00.145> evidential—to<00:03:00.476> come<00:03:00.807> up<00:03:01.138> with<00:03:01.469> evidential<00:03:01.800> information
00:03:02.800 --> 00:03:11.200
that<00:03:03.120> come<00:03:03.360> up<00:03:03.599> with<00:03:04.239> very<00:03:04.680> accurate<00:03:05.519> information<00:03:06.000> about<00:03:06.239> somebody<00:03:06.599> who<00:03:06.840> died.<00:03:07.640> Not<00:03:08.159> generalities,<00:03:09.159> not<00:03:09.400> things<00:03:09.640> that<00:03:09.840> one<00:03:10.000> could<00:03:10.159> say,<00:03:10.440> "Well,<00:03:10.959> you
00:03:11.200 --> 00:03:19.519
have<00:03:11.400> a<00:03:11.640> scar<00:03:12.159> on<00:03:12.400> your<00:03:12.920> left<00:03:13.239> knee."<00:03:14.120> Well,<00:03:14.319> maybe<00:03:14.599> you<00:03:14.760> do,<00:03:15.319> but<00:03:15.560> we<00:03:15.840> children<00:03:16.360> ended<00:03:16.640> up<00:03:16.799> falling<00:03:17.120> a<00:03:17.280> lot,<00:03:17.760> so<00:03:18.760> that<00:03:18.959> might<00:03:19.159> be<00:03:19.319> a
00:03:19.519 --> 00:03:28.920
good<00:03:19.760> guess,<00:03:20.480> nothing<00:03:20.799> more<00:03:21.040> than<00:03:21.239> that.<00:03:21.720> But<00:03:21.879> they<00:03:22.080> come<00:03:22.360> with<00:03:22.519> something<00:03:22.799> more<00:03:23.080> specific<00:03:23.480> to<00:03:23.599> say,<00:03:24.280> "You<00:03:24.720> had<00:03:25.400> a<00:03:25.680> pet<00:03:25.959> doll<00:03:26.560> and<00:03:26.760> her<00:03:26.959> name<00:03:27.400> was<00:03:28.080> Susy,
00:03:28.920 --> 00:03:37.400
and<00:03:29.799> Susy<00:03:30.159> was<00:03:30.400> chewed<00:03:31.040> by<00:03:31.439> your<00:03:31.760> dog<00:03:32.360> whose<00:03:32.599> name<00:03:32.879> was<00:03:33.159> Blacky,<00:03:34.040> whom<00:03:34.319> your<00:03:34.640> sister<00:03:35.599> loved<00:03:36.000> to<00:03:36.200> embrace."<00:03:36.680> You<00:03:36.799> know,<00:03:37.120> coming
00:03:37.400 --> 00:03:46.159
up<00:03:37.640> with<00:03:38.239> super<00:03:38.640> precise<00:03:39.080> information<00:03:39.959> while<00:03:40.200> at<00:03:40.360> the<00:03:40.480> same<00:03:40.720> time<00:03:40.959> there<00:03:41.080> are<00:03:41.319> researchers<00:03:42.239> who<00:03:42.360> are<00:03:42.519> writing<00:03:43.040> everything<00:03:43.400> that<00:03:43.519> is<00:03:43.720> going<00:03:43.920> on<00:03:44.400> to<00:03:44.599> make<00:03:44.840> sure<00:03:45.319> that
00:03:46.159 --> 00:03:55.400
the<00:03:46.319> people<00:03:46.560> who<00:03:46.680> are<00:03:46.799> being<00:03:47.040> read<00:03:47.360> to<00:03:47.840> are<00:03:48.040> not<00:03:48.319> providing<00:03:48.920> information.<00:03:49.920> They<00:03:50.040> are<00:03:50.360> making<00:03:50.720> sure<00:03:51.080> that<00:03:51.239> the<00:03:51.400> medium<00:03:52.400> has<00:03:52.599> not<00:03:52.840> done<00:03:54.400> anything
00:03:55.400 --> 00:04:04.760
cloudy,<00:03:56.120> dizzy,<00:03:57.159> dishonest,<00:03:58.159> and<00:03:58.319> so<00:03:58.640> they<00:03:58.799> come<00:03:59.000> up<00:03:59.200> with<00:03:59.319> that<00:04:00.239> information.<00:04:01.239> Right.<00:04:01.400> So<00:04:01.640> one<00:04:01.760> of<00:04:01.959> the<00:04:02.200> arguments<00:04:03.079> against<00:04:04.079> that
00:04:04.760 --> 00:04:13.560
in<00:04:05.200> that<00:04:05.480> data<00:04:06.239> being,<00:04:07.239> um,<00:04:07.760> supportive<00:04:08.400> of<00:04:08.599> life<00:04:08.920> after<00:04:09.319> death,<00:04:10.159> ironically<00:04:10.799> comes<00:04:11.159> from<00:04:12.319> parapsychologists<00:04:13.319> who
00:04:13.560 --> 00:04:21.840
say<00:04:13.947> this<00:04:14.333> could<00:04:14.720> be<00:04:15.107> evidence<00:04:15.493> of<00:04:15.880> what<00:04:16.267> they<00:04:16.653> may<00:04:17.040> say<00:04:17.427> is<00:04:17.813> super-psi.<00:04:18.200> In<00:04:18.587> other<00:04:18.973> words,<00:04:19.360> the—they're<00:04:19.747> not<00:04:20.133> communicating<00:04:20.520> with<00:04:20.907> the<00:04:21.293> dead,<00:04:21.680> what
00:04:21.840 --> 00:04:31.360
they're<00:04:22.505> doing<00:04:23.169> is<00:04:23.834> they're<00:04:24.498> having<00:04:25.163> some,<00:04:25.827> um,<00:04:26.492> precognition<00:04:27.156> or—or—or—or—or—or<00:04:27.821> some<00:04:28.485> sort<00:04:29.150> of<00:04:29.814> telepathic<00:04:30.479> relationship
00:04:31.360 --> 00:04:40.400
with<00:04:31.479> the<00:04:31.639> living<00:04:32.360> that<00:04:32.520> enables<00:04:33.080> them<00:04:33.320> to<00:04:33.560> get<00:04:34.960> information<00:04:35.960> that<00:04:36.240> is<00:04:37.360> nonsensory,<00:04:38.360> and<00:04:38.479> so<00:04:38.680> it<00:04:38.840> does<00:04:39.120> not<00:04:39.720> prove
00:04:40.400 --> 00:04:48.680
life<00:04:40.720> after<00:04:41.080> death,<00:04:41.759> but<00:04:42.039> rather<00:04:42.400> prove<00:04:42.919> some<00:04:43.919> aspect<00:04:44.320> of<00:04:45.320> super-psi.<00:04:46.320> And<00:04:46.680> I<00:04:46.800> think<00:04:47.080> that<00:04:47.240> is<00:04:47.360> a<00:04:47.639> hypothesis<00:04:48.240> that<00:04:48.400> must
00:04:48.680 --> 00:04:57.000
be<00:04:49.320> entertained.<00:04:50.320> Will<00:04:50.600> we<00:04:50.840> be<00:04:51.080> able<00:04:51.479> to<00:04:51.759> have<00:04:52.199> some<00:04:52.759> kind<00:04:53.280> of<00:04:53.960> research<00:04:54.560> that<00:04:54.720> can<00:04:54.919> disentangle<00:04:55.600> between<00:04:55.960> both<00:04:56.120> of<00:04:56.280> them?<00:04:56.880> At
00:04:57.000 --> 00:05:06.080
least<00:04:57.199> at<00:04:57.360> this<00:04:57.600> point,<00:04:57.919> I<00:04:58.080> don't<00:04:58.360> think<00:04:58.600> so.<00:04:59.759> Maybe<00:05:00.240> at<00:05:00.400> some<00:05:00.560> other<00:05:00.759> point<00:05:01.000> it<00:05:01.160> will.<00:05:01.759> I'm<00:05:01.880> reading<00:05:02.320> right<00:05:02.520> now,<00:05:02.800> or<00:05:02.960> I<00:05:03.120> finished<00:05:03.440> reading,<00:05:03.680> a<00:05:03.840> very<00:05:04.080> good<00:05:04.320> novel,<00:05:04.960> uh,<00:05:05.320> Booker
00:05:06.080 --> 00:05:14.720
Prize<00:05:06.440> finalist<00:05:07.000> by<00:05:07.160> Anne<00:05:07.360> Michaels,<00:05:08.160> Held,<00:05:09.160> and<00:05:09.440> she<00:05:10.440> gets<00:05:10.800> the<00:05:10.960> notion<00:05:11.479> that<00:05:11.680> survival<00:05:12.240> is<00:05:12.479> demonstrated<00:05:13.199> by<00:05:14.199> events,
00:05:14.720 --> 00:05:23.479
everyday<00:05:15.160> events<00:05:15.680> where<00:05:16.039> somebody's<00:05:16.600> trying<00:05:16.880> to<00:05:17.160> contact<00:05:17.720> us.<00:05:18.720> I<00:05:19.400> respect<00:05:20.400> the<00:05:20.800> depth<00:05:21.280> of<00:05:21.680> feeling,<00:05:22.680> the<00:05:22.960> clarity
00:05:23.479 --> 00:05:31.919
in<00:05:23.720> her<00:05:23.960> thought<00:05:24.240> of<00:05:24.520> how<00:05:24.880> she<00:05:25.280> is<00:05:26.160> showing<00:05:26.840> that.<00:05:27.840> Am<00:05:28.039> I<00:05:28.319> fully<00:05:28.840> persuaded?<00:05:29.800> No.<00:05:30.400> At<00:05:30.520> the<00:05:30.680> same<00:05:30.919> time<00:05:31.120> that<00:05:31.280> I<00:05:31.400> have<00:05:31.680> at
00:05:31.919 --> 00:05:40.720
times<00:05:32.240> felt<00:05:32.639> that<00:05:32.800> some<00:05:33.000> of<00:05:33.160> my<00:05:33.319> dear<00:05:33.639> departed<00:05:34.560> felt<00:05:35.240> close,<00:05:36.240> is<00:05:36.440> that<00:05:36.800> just<00:05:37.199> something<00:05:37.520> I<00:05:37.759> made<00:05:38.000> up?<00:05:38.759> The<00:05:38.960> issue<00:05:39.280> then<00:05:39.479> becomes<00:05:40.440> that
00:05:40.720 --> 00:05:48.919
I<00:05:41.101> made<00:05:41.482> up,<00:05:41.863> and<00:05:42.244> that<00:05:42.625> when—it<00:05:43.006> takes<00:05:43.387> us<00:05:43.768> back<00:05:44.149> to<00:05:44.530> our<00:05:44.910> ordinary<00:05:45.291> sense<00:05:45.672> of<00:05:46.053> self<00:05:46.434> where<00:05:46.815> we<00:05:47.196> are<00:05:47.577> separate.<00:05:47.958> When<00:05:48.339> we<00:05:48.720> take
00:05:48.919 --> 00:05:56.560
the<00:05:49.080> notion<00:05:49.440> of<00:05:49.759> we<00:05:49.919> may<00:05:50.120> be<00:05:50.280> interconnected<00:05:51.039> and<00:05:51.160> there<00:05:51.280> is<00:05:51.400> no<00:05:51.600> time<00:05:51.759> and<00:05:52.000> space,<00:05:52.960> then<00:05:53.360> all<00:05:53.720> the<00:05:53.880> bets<00:05:54.240> are<00:05:54.560> off.
Chapters
No chapters for this episode.
Transcript
No transcript for this episode.
No matching lines.
Hosts & Guests
Ian Ross
author, artist and community builder - I write tiny books about big experiences for beginners, believers and the curious but not convinced.
View profileComments
Up next
All episodesVideo What Is the Best Evidence for Life After Death? | Jeffrey Mishlove
Is there definitive proof of life after death? Jeffrey Mishlove joins Closer To Truth to present his award-winning "bundle of arrows" argument, exploring near-death experiences, mediumship, and the metaphysical frameworks of consciousness beyond the brain.
Video Can the Dying See the Other Side? A Hospice Doctor’s Remarkable Findings
Discover the comforting reality of end-of-life experiences with hospice doctor Dr. Chris Kerr, who shares how vivid visitations from deceased loved ones help the dying find peace, forgiveness, and closure in their final days.
Video Oprah and a Doctor Explore What Near Death Experiences Reveal About Life and Beyond
What happens when we die, and how does it change how we live? Join Oprah and Dr. Bruce Grayson as they explore the profound mysteries of near-death experiences with incredible firsthand stories from Jeremy Renner, Dr. Mary Neal, and more.