> ## Content Index
> Fetch the complete content index at: https://famouspsychicmediums.com/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover other available public pages before exploring further.

# A Brief Overview of Mediumship Accuracy Testing at the Windbridge Research Center
- URL: https://famouspsychicmediums.com/episodes/a-brief-overview-of-mediumship-accuracy-testing-at-the-windbridge-research-center/
- Published: 2026-09-15T21:58:51.000Z
- Updated: 2026-09-15T21:58:51.000Z
- Description: How do scientists test if mediums are actually communicating with the deceased? Discover the rigorous quintuple-blind protocol used by the Windbridge Research Center to eliminate fraud, bias, and cueing in mediumship research.
- Author: Angie Li
- Tags: Science, News

Dr. Julie Beischel, Director of Research at the Windbridge Research Center, provides an overview of how researchers scientifically test the accuracy and specificity of information reported by mediums. To ensure the validity of these tests, researchers must eliminate alternative explanations such as fraud, cold reading, experimenter cueing, and rater bias.

To address these variables, the Windbridge Research Center utilizes a rigorous, peer-reviewed quintuple-blind protocol. This methodology involves five distinct levels of blinding among the mediums, sitters, and three separate experimenters, ensuring that no one involved can inadvertently influence the results or bias the scoring.

The results of a study using this protocol, which analyzed 58 readings from 20 pre-screened mediums, demonstrated statistically significant accuracy. This phenomenon, termed Anomalous Information Reception (AIR), shows that mediums can report accurate, specific details about the deceased without prior knowledge or deception, though further research is needed to determine the exact source of this information.

### Key takeaways

- Mediumship research at the Windbridge Research Center is divided into three arms: information, operation, and application.
- To scientifically validate mediumship, researchers must control for fraud, cold reading, general statements, experimenter cueing, and rater bias.
- The quintuple-blind protocol utilizes five levels of blinding to isolate the medium and sitter from any potential source of sensory or cognitive bias.
- A peer-reviewed 2015 study demonstrated that sitters scored target readings as significantly more accurate than decoy readings.
- The term Anomalous Information Reception (AIR) describes when mediums report accurate, specific information about the deceased with no prior knowledge or feedback.

### Highlights

- 1:10 — The three main arms of mediumship research
- 1:45 — Alternative explanations for mediumship accuracy
- 3:40 — How rater bias affects accuracy scores
- 4:22 — Explaining the five levels of blinding
- 5:44 — Statistically significant results from the 2015 study
- 6:33 — Understanding Anomalous Information Reception

```chapters
00:00:00 Introduction to Windbridge Research Center
00:01:10 Three Arms of Mediumship Research
00:01:45 Addressing Fraud and Cold Reading
00:02:45 Eliminating Experimenter Cueing and Bias
00:04:22 The Quintuple-Blind Research Protocol
00:05:44 Results of the Mediumship Study
00:06:33 Defining Anomalous Information Reception
```

```vtt
WEBVTT

00:00:09.440 --> 00:00:16.480
Hello,<00:00:10.240> my<00:00:10.400> name<00:00:10.559> is<00:00:10.719> Julie<00:00:11.040> Beischel,<00:00:11.599> and<00:00:11.679> I'm<00:00:11.840> Director<00:00:12.240> of<00:00:12.320> Research<00:00:12.719> at<00:00:12.799> the<00:00:12.880> Windbridge<00:00:13.280> Research<00:00:13.679> Center.<00:00:14.480> I<00:00:14.639> have<00:00:14.799> been<00:00:14.960> performing<00:00:15.440> laboratory<00:00:15.920> research<00:00:16.320> with

00:00:16.480 --> 00:00:21.600
American<00:00:17.010> mediums<00:00:17.540> full-time<00:00:18.070> since<00:00:18.600> 2003.

00:00:21.600 --> 00:00:30.080
People<00:00:21.920> called<00:00:22.160> mediums<00:00:24.080> experience<00:00:24.720> regular<00:00:25.199> communication<00:00:25.920> from<00:00:26.080> the<00:00:26.240> deceased<00:00:28.240> and<00:00:28.480> report<00:00:28.800> the<00:00:28.960> resulting<00:00:29.439> messages<00:00:29.920> to

00:00:30.080 --> 00:00:39.280
the<00:00:30.240> living<00:00:30.640> friends<00:00:30.960> or<00:00:31.039> relatives<00:00:31.599> of<00:00:31.679> the<00:00:31.840> deceased,<00:00:32.320> called<00:00:32.640> sitters,<00:00:34.640> during<00:00:34.960> specific<00:00:35.520> events<00:00:36.000> called<00:00:36.399> readings.

00:00:39.280 --> 00:00:46.160
My<00:00:39.520> research<00:00:40.000> has<00:00:40.160> been<00:00:40.320> published<00:00:40.719> in<00:00:40.800> numerous<00:00:41.360> peer-reviewed<00:00:42.840> journals

00:00:46.160 --> 00:00:51.520
and<00:00:46.320> I've<00:00:46.480> contributed<00:00:47.120> chapters<00:00:47.520> to<00:00:47.680> multiple<00:00:48.239> academic<00:00:48.800> anthologies,

00:00:51.520 --> 00:00:56.719
as<00:00:51.760> well<00:00:51.920> as<00:00:52.079> to<00:00:52.239> Leslie<00:00:52.640> Kean's<00:00:52.960> book,<00:00:53.280> Surviving<00:00:53.840> Death.

00:00:56.719 --> 00:01:04.400
I<00:00:56.960> currently<00:00:57.360> perform<00:00:57.760> research<00:00:58.160> at<00:00:58.239> the<00:00:58.320> Windbridge<00:00:58.800> Research<00:00:59.120> Center,<00:00:59.600> a<00:00:59.760> charity<00:01:00.239> dedicated<00:01:00.879> to<00:01:01.039> performing<00:01:01.520> rigorous<00:01:02.000> scientific<00:01:02.559> research<00:01:03.440> and<00:01:03.680> creating<00:01:04.159> free

00:01:04.400 --> 00:01:10.320
educational<00:01:05.040> materials<00:01:05.760> focused<00:01:06.159> on<00:01:06.320> dying,<00:01:06.799> death,<00:01:07.200> and<00:01:07.280> what<00:01:07.520> comes<00:01:07.760> next.

00:01:10.320 --> 00:01:20.799
The<00:01:10.479> mediumship<00:01:11.040> research<00:01:11.439> we<00:01:11.600> perform<00:01:12.080> has<00:01:12.320> three<00:01:12.640> main<00:01:12.960> arms:<00:01:13.840> information,<00:01:14.560> operation,<00:01:15.200> and<00:01:15.360> application.<00:01:16.479> Today,<00:01:16.880> I'll<00:01:17.040> be<00:01:17.200> focusing<00:01:17.759> on<00:01:18.000> information.

00:01:20.799 --> 00:01:30.720
The<00:01:21.119> information<00:01:21.680> research<00:01:22.159> program<00:01:22.640> investigates<00:01:23.360> the<00:01:23.520> content<00:01:24.000> of<00:01:24.159> the<00:01:24.320> readings<00:01:24.720> the<00:01:24.880> mediums<00:01:25.280> provide,<00:01:26.159> as<00:01:26.400> well<00:01:26.640> as<00:01:26.880> its<00:01:27.040> accuracy<00:01:27.759> and<00:01:27.920> specificity.

00:01:30.720 --> 00:01:37.840
In<00:01:30.880> a<00:01:30.960> normal<00:01:31.280> reading,<00:01:31.680> there's<00:01:31.920> just<00:01:32.159> the<00:01:32.240> medium<00:01:32.640> and<00:01:32.720> the<00:01:32.880> sitter.<00:01:33.439> If<00:01:33.600> the<00:01:33.759> medium<00:01:34.159> provides<00:01:34.560> accurate<00:01:34.960> information,<00:01:36.000> they<00:01:36.159> may<00:01:36.400> be<00:01:36.560> legitimately<00:01:37.280> communicating

00:01:37.840 --> 00:01:45.280
with<00:01:38.079> the<00:01:38.159> deceased.<00:01:39.200> However,<00:01:39.759> other<00:01:40.079> factors<00:01:40.479> could<00:01:40.640> be<00:01:40.799> involved<00:01:41.200> that<00:01:41.360> we<00:01:41.600> have<00:01:41.759> to<00:01:41.920> address<00:01:42.320> during<00:01:42.560> research.

00:01:45.280 --> 00:01:53.520
The<00:01:45.439> medium<00:01:45.840> could<00:01:46.000> be<00:01:46.159> using<00:01:46.479> fraud<00:01:46.880> or<00:01:46.960> deception.<00:01:47.759> They<00:01:47.920> could<00:01:48.079> have<00:01:48.240> looked<00:01:48.560> up<00:01:48.720> information<00:01:49.200> about<00:01:49.520> the<00:01:49.680> sitter<00:01:50.000> or<00:01:50.159> the<00:01:50.240> deceased<00:01:50.799> prior<00:01:51.119> to<00:01:51.280> the<00:01:51.360> reading.<00:01:53.360> They

00:01:53.520 --> 00:02:02.640
could<00:01:53.932> be<00:01:54.344> using<00:01:54.756> what's<00:01:55.168> called<00:01:55.580> cold<00:01:55.992> reading,<00:01:56.404> where<00:01:56.816> they<00:01:57.228> use<00:01:57.640> sensory<00:01:58.051> information<00:01:58.463> from<00:01:58.875> the<00:01:59.287> sitter—things<00:01:59.699> like<00:02:00.111> facial<00:02:00.523> expressions,<00:02:00.935> gasps,<00:02:01.347> even<00:02:01.759> scents—

00:02:02.640 --> 00:02:11.120
to<00:02:02.960> fabricate<00:02:03.520> what<00:02:03.759> seems<00:02:04.079> to<00:02:04.159> be<00:02:04.320> an<00:02:04.479> accurate<00:02:04.799> reading<00:02:05.200> from<00:02:05.360> the<00:02:06.840> deceased.<00:02:08.080> Reading<00:02:08.399> can<00:02:08.560> also<00:02:08.879> include<00:02:09.119> the<00:02:09.280> medium<00:02:09.679> reporting<00:02:10.239> information<00:02:10.879> so

00:02:11.120 --> 00:02:19.520
general<00:02:11.680> it<00:02:11.760> could<00:02:12.000> apply<00:02:12.239> to<00:02:12.400> nearly<00:02:12.879> anyone.<00:02:14.239> During<00:02:14.560> research,<00:02:14.959> we<00:02:15.200> address<00:02:15.680> the<00:02:15.840> alternative<00:02:16.480> explanations<00:02:17.200> for<00:02:17.360> the<00:02:17.440> medium's<00:02:17.920> accuracy<00:02:18.959> using<00:02:19.280> what's

00:02:19.520 --> 00:02:24.800
called<00:02:19.840> masking<00:02:20.480> or<00:02:20.640> blinding<00:02:21.280> of<00:02:21.440> the<00:02:21.599> people<00:02:22.000> involved.

00:02:24.800 --> 00:02:33.360
We<00:02:25.040> don't<00:02:25.440> allow<00:02:25.680> the<00:02:25.840> medium<00:02:26.239> any<00:02:26.560> information<00:02:27.200> about,<00:02:27.760> access<00:02:28.239> to,<00:02:28.640> or<00:02:28.800> contact<00:02:29.360> with<00:02:29.599> the<00:02:29.840> sitter.<00:02:30.879> In<00:02:31.120> addition,<00:02:31.440> the<00:02:31.599> mediums<00:02:32.080> are<00:02:32.160> asked<00:02:32.400> specific<00:02:32.879> questions

00:02:33.360 --> 00:02:45.040
about<00:02:33.519> the<00:02:33.760> appearance,<00:02:34.319> personality,<00:02:35.120> activities,<00:02:35.760> and<00:02:35.920> cause<00:02:36.160> of<00:02:36.319> death<00:02:36.640> of<00:02:36.800> the<00:02:36.959> deceased.<00:02:38.400> These<00:02:38.959> factors<00:02:39.440> address<00:02:39.840> fraud<00:02:40.319> as<00:02:40.480> well<00:02:40.720> as<00:02:40.879> cold<00:02:41.200> reading.

00:02:45.040 --> 00:02:53.599
The<00:02:45.200> reading<00:02:45.519> takes<00:02:45.840> place<00:02:46.160> over<00:02:46.400> the<00:02:46.560> phone<00:02:46.879> with<00:02:47.040> an<00:02:47.280> experimenter<00:02:48.000> serving<00:02:48.400> as<00:02:48.560> a<00:02:48.640> proxy<00:02:49.200> for<00:02:49.360> the<00:02:49.519> absent<00:02:50.080> distance<00:02:50.640> sitter.<00:02:51.440> But<00:02:51.680> if<00:02:51.760> that<00:02:52.000> experimenter<00:02:52.640> had<00:02:52.879> information

00:02:53.599 --> 00:03:01.440
about<00:02:53.840> the<00:02:54.000> sitter<00:02:54.400> or<00:02:54.560> the<00:02:54.640> deceased<00:02:55.120> person,<00:02:55.519> they<00:02:55.680> could<00:02:55.920> intentionally<00:02:56.640> or<00:02:56.879> inadvertently<00:02:57.680> cue<00:02:57.920> the<00:02:58.080> medium<00:02:58.480> during<00:02:58.720> the<00:02:58.879> reading.

00:03:01.440 --> 00:03:09.200
To<00:03:01.680> address<00:03:02.080> cueing<00:03:02.400> by<00:03:02.640> the<00:03:02.720> experimenter,<00:03:03.680> that<00:03:03.920> experimenter<00:03:04.640> only<00:03:04.879> interacts<00:03:05.360> with<00:03:05.519> the<00:03:05.680> mediums,<00:03:06.560> and<00:03:06.800> a<00:03:06.879> different<00:03:07.280> experimenter<00:03:08.000> can<00:03:08.159> sense<00:03:08.480> the<00:03:08.640> sitters<00:03:09.040> for

00:03:09.200 --> 00:03:16.159
research<00:03:10.159> and<00:03:10.400> trains<00:03:10.720> them<00:03:10.879> about<00:03:11.200> their<00:03:11.440> tasks<00:03:12.239> prior<00:03:12.560> to<00:03:12.720> the<00:03:12.800> reading<00:03:13.120> taking<00:03:13.519> place.

00:03:16.159 --> 00:03:24.720
To<00:03:16.319> test<00:03:16.560> the<00:03:16.720> accuracy<00:03:17.360> of<00:03:17.440> the<00:03:17.599> reading,<00:03:18.159> we<00:03:18.319> give<00:03:18.560> the<00:03:18.720> absent<00:03:19.120> sitter<00:03:19.440> a<00:03:19.599> transcript<00:03:20.159> of<00:03:20.239> the<00:03:20.400> reading<00:03:21.120> and<00:03:21.280> ask<00:03:21.519> them<00:03:21.760> to<00:03:21.920> rate<00:03:22.159> the<00:03:22.319> accuracy<00:03:23.200> of<00:03:23.360> each<00:03:23.680> medium<00:03:24.480> of

00:03:24.720 --> 00:03:32.319
each<00:03:24.879> of<00:03:25.040> the<00:03:25.120> medium<00:03:25.519> statements<00:03:26.319> and<00:03:26.480> give<00:03:26.720> the<00:03:26.879> overall<00:03:27.360> reading<00:03:27.680> a<00:03:27.840> score.<00:03:28.879> The<00:03:29.040> sitter<00:03:29.360> is<00:03:29.440> the<00:03:29.599> only<00:03:29.840> person<00:03:30.239> qualified<00:03:30.720> to<00:03:30.879> score<00:03:31.120> a<00:03:31.200> reading<00:03:31.519> for<00:03:31.680> how<00:03:31.920> well<00:03:32.159> it

00:03:32.319 --> 00:03:40.640
applies<00:03:32.640> to<00:03:32.879> them.<00:03:33.680> But<00:03:33.840> now,<00:03:34.080> another<00:03:34.560> alternative<00:03:35.200> explanation<00:03:35.840> may<00:03:36.000> be<00:03:36.239> responsible<00:03:36.799> for<00:03:37.040> reading<00:03:37.440> scored<00:03:37.840> as<00:03:38.080> accurate.

00:03:40.640 --> 00:03:48.640
When<00:03:40.799> someone<00:03:41.200> knows<00:03:41.440> a<00:03:41.519> reading<00:03:41.840> was<00:03:42.080> intended<00:03:42.480> for<00:03:42.640> them,<00:03:42.879> their<00:03:43.120> accuracy<00:03:43.599> scores<00:03:44.000> may<00:03:44.159> not<00:03:44.400> reflect<00:03:44.840> reality<00:03:45.840> due<00:03:46.000> to<00:03:46.159> what's<00:03:46.400> called<00:03:46.720> rater<00:03:47.120> bias.<00:03:48.080> Based<00:03:48.400> on<00:03:48.480> their

00:03:48.640 --> 00:03:57.120
personalities,<00:03:49.519> some<00:03:49.760> people<00:03:50.000> will<00:03:50.159> score<00:03:50.560> nearly<00:03:50.879> every<00:03:51.200> item<00:03:51.519> as<00:03:51.680> accurate,<00:03:52.480> and<00:03:52.720> some<00:03:52.879> will<00:03:53.120> score<00:03:53.599> very<00:03:53.920> few<00:03:54.319> items<00:03:54.720> as<00:03:54.879> such.<00:03:56.879> To

00:03:57.120 --> 00:04:04.799
address<00:03:57.519> this,<00:03:58.000> the<00:03:58.159> medium<00:03:58.560> provides<00:03:58.879> a<00:03:58.959> reading<00:03:59.280> for<00:03:59.439> a<00:03:59.519> second<00:03:59.920> sitter,<00:04:00.560> and<00:04:00.720> each<00:04:00.959> sitter<00:04:01.280> scores<00:04:01.680> each<00:04:02.000> reading<00:04:02.319> as<00:04:02.480> to<00:04:02.640> well<00:04:02.959> it<00:04:03.439> it<00:04:03.680> applies<00:04:04.000> to<00:04:04.159> their<00:04:04.319> deceased

00:04:04.799 --> 00:04:13.280
loved<00:04:05.040> one<00:04:05.519> without<00:04:06.000> knowing<00:04:06.720> which<00:04:06.959> reading<00:04:07.280> was<00:04:07.519> intended<00:04:07.920> for<00:04:08.080> them.<00:04:09.920> The<00:04:10.080> sitters<00:04:10.480> also<00:04:10.879> choose<00:04:11.120> which<00:04:11.360> of<00:04:11.439> the<00:04:11.519> two<00:04:11.760> readings<00:04:12.080> they<00:04:12.239> think<00:04:12.480> was<00:04:12.720> intended<00:04:13.120> for

00:04:13.280 --> 00:04:22.320
them<00:04:13.519> and<00:04:13.599> their<00:04:13.760> deceased<00:04:14.239> loved<00:04:14.480> one.<00:04:16.799> This<00:04:17.120> requires<00:04:17.600> a<00:04:17.759> third<00:04:18.079> experimenter<00:04:18.799> who<00:04:18.959> interacts<00:04:19.359> with<00:04:19.519> the<00:04:19.680> sitters<00:04:20.000> during<00:04:20.320> scoring.<00:04:22.000> This

00:04:22.320 --> 00:04:27.600
published,<00:04:22.720> peer-reviewed<00:04:23.280> protocol<00:04:23.919> involves<00:04:24.320> five<00:04:24.639> levels<00:04:25.040> of<00:04:25.120> blinding:<00:04:26.960> 1.

00:04:27.600 --> 00:04:35.120
The<00:04:27.759> medium<00:04:28.240> is<00:04:28.320> blinded<00:04:28.720> to<00:04:28.880> information<00:04:29.440> about<00:04:29.680> the<00:04:29.840> sitter<00:04:30.240> and<00:04:30.320> the<00:04:30.479> deceased<00:04:31.040> before,<00:04:31.600> during,<00:04:31.919> and<00:04:32.080> after<00:04:32.320> the<00:04:32.479> reading,<00:04:33.199> and<00:04:33.520> asks<00:04:33.759> questions<00:04:34.160> about<00:04:34.400> the<00:04:34.560> deceased's

00:04:35.120 --> 00:04:43.600
appearance,<00:04:35.680> personality,<00:04:36.479> activities,<00:04:37.120> and<00:04:37.280> cause<00:04:37.600> of<00:04:37.759> death.<00:04:39.600> Two,<00:04:40.000> the<00:04:40.240> sitters<00:04:40.560> do<00:04:40.720> not<00:04:40.880> hear<00:04:41.120> the<00:04:41.199> readings<00:04:41.520> as<00:04:41.680> they<00:04:41.919> occur.<00:04:42.560> They<00:04:42.720> score<00:04:43.120> blinded

00:04:43.600 --> 00:04:50.800
transcripts<00:04:44.160> of<00:04:44.400> two<00:04:44.560> readings:<00:04:45.040> one<00:04:45.280> for<00:04:45.440> their<00:04:45.680> deceased,<00:04:46.160> which<00:04:46.400> we<00:04:46.560> call<00:04:46.720> a<00:04:46.880> target<00:04:47.199> reading,<00:04:47.919> and<00:04:48.080> one<00:04:48.320> for<00:04:48.479> another<00:04:48.880> sitter's<00:04:49.280> deceased,<00:04:49.759> which<00:04:49.919> we<00:04:50.080> call<00:04:50.240> a<00:04:50.320> decoy

00:04:50.800 --> 00:04:59.360
reading,<00:04:51.440> without<00:04:51.840> knowing<00:04:52.160> which<00:04:52.400> is<00:04:52.560> which.<00:04:54.320> Three,<00:04:55.040> the<00:04:55.280> experimenter<00:04:55.919> who<00:04:56.160> consents<00:04:56.720> and<00:04:56.800> trains<00:04:57.199> the<00:04:57.360> sitters,<00:04:57.840> experimenter<00:04:58.479> one,<00:04:59.120> is

00:04:59.360 --> 00:05:07.840
blinded<00:04:59.759> to<00:04:59.919> which<00:05:00.160> mediums<00:05:00.639> read<00:05:00.960> which<00:05:01.199> sitters<00:05:01.680> and<00:05:01.840> which<00:05:02.080> readings<00:05:02.479> were<00:05:02.639> intended<00:05:03.039> for<00:05:03.199> which<00:05:03.440> sitters.<00:05:05.360> Four,<00:05:06.000> the<00:05:06.240> experimenter<00:05:06.880> who<00:05:07.120> interacts<00:05:07.600> with

00:05:07.840 --> 00:05:15.360
the<00:05:07.919> mediums<00:05:08.400> during<00:05:08.639> the<00:05:08.800> phone<00:05:09.039> readings<00:05:09.360> and<00:05:09.600> formats<00:05:10.080> the<00:05:10.240> readings<00:05:10.560> into<00:05:10.880> item<00:05:11.120> lists<00:05:11.440> for<00:05:11.600> scoring,<00:05:12.320> experimenter<00:05:13.039> two,<00:05:13.680> is<00:05:13.840> blinded<00:05:14.240> to<00:05:14.479> information<00:05:14.960> about<00:05:15.199> the

00:05:15.360 --> 00:05:18.960
sitters<00:05:15.759> and<00:05:15.919> the<00:05:16.080> deceased.<00:05:18.080> 5.

00:05:18.960 --> 00:05:26.880
The<00:05:19.120> experimenter<00:05:19.680> who<00:05:19.919> interacts<00:05:20.320> with<00:05:20.479> the<00:05:20.639> sitters<00:05:20.960> during<00:05:21.280> scoring,<00:05:21.840> that<00:05:22.080> is,<00:05:22.320> emails<00:05:22.800> and<00:05:22.960> receives<00:05:23.280> by<00:05:23.520> email<00:05:23.840> the<00:05:24.000> blinded<00:05:24.400> readings,<00:05:24.880> experimenter<00:05:25.520> three,<00:05:26.240> is<00:05:26.479> blinded

00:05:26.880 --> 00:05:35.199
to<00:05:27.039> all<00:05:27.280> information<00:05:27.840> about<00:05:28.000> the<00:05:28.160> deceased,<00:05:28.639> to<00:05:28.800> which<00:05:29.039> medium<00:05:29.440> performed<00:05:29.759> which<00:05:30.080> readings,<00:05:30.720> and<00:05:30.880> to<00:05:31.039> which<00:05:31.280> readings<00:05:31.600> were<00:05:31.840> intended<00:05:32.240> for<00:05:32.400> which<00:05:32.720> sitter.<00:05:34.880> This

00:05:35.199 --> 00:05:44.479
fully<00:05:35.726> masked<00:05:36.253> or<00:05:36.780> quintuple-blind<00:05:37.307> protocol<00:05:37.835> addresses<00:05:38.362> the<00:05:38.889> normal<00:05:39.416> explanations<00:05:39.943> for<00:05:40.470> the<00:05:40.997> source<00:05:41.524> of<00:05:42.052> a<00:05:42.579> medium's<00:05:43.106> accurate<00:05:43.633> reading.<00:05:44.160> Using

00:05:44.479 --> 00:05:53.199
this<00:05:44.639> protocol,<00:05:45.199> we<00:05:45.440> collected<00:05:45.919> accuracy<00:05:46.479> data<00:05:46.800> from<00:05:47.120> 58<00:05:47.840> readings<00:05:48.400> performed<00:05:48.800> by<00:05:49.039> 20<00:05:49.840> pre-screened<00:05:50.840> mediums.<00:05:52.960> The

00:05:53.199 --> 00:06:00.160
results<00:05:53.600> from<00:05:53.759> the<00:05:53.919> analysis<00:05:54.479> of<00:05:54.560> that<00:05:54.800> data<00:05:55.199> were<00:05:55.440> published<00:05:55.840> in<00:05:56.000> a<00:05:56.080> peer-reviewed<00:05:56.639> journal<00:05:57.039> article<00:05:57.440> in<00:05:57.600> 2015.

00:06:00.160 --> 00:06:07.440
The<00:06:00.319> results<00:06:00.800> demonstrated<00:06:01.360> that<00:06:01.520> blinded<00:06:01.919> sitters<00:06:02.319> scored<00:06:02.560> the<00:06:02.720> items<00:06:03.120> in<00:06:03.360> target<00:06:03.680> readings<00:06:04.080> intended<00:06:04.560> for<00:06:04.720> them<00:06:05.280> as<00:06:05.520> significantly<00:06:06.319> more<00:06:06.639> accurate<00:06:07.120> than<00:06:07.280> they

00:06:07.440 --> 00:06:16.000
scored<00:06:07.840> items<00:06:08.240> in<00:06:08.400> decoy<00:06:08.880> readings<00:06:09.199> for<00:06:09.360> other<00:06:09.680> sitters.<00:06:10.639> This<00:06:10.880> difference<00:06:11.280> was<00:06:11.520> statistically<00:06:12.240> significant.<00:06:14.319> The<00:06:14.560> overall<00:06:14.960> reading<00:06:15.280> score<00:06:15.680> data

00:06:16.000 --> 00:06:24.479
had<00:06:16.160> a<00:06:16.240> similar<00:06:16.720> statistically<00:06:17.360> significant<00:06:18.840> finding.<00:06:20.080> In<00:06:20.240> addition,<00:06:20.720> a<00:06:20.880> large<00:06:21.199> majority<00:06:21.759> of<00:06:21.840> blinded<00:06:22.240> sitters<00:06:22.960> chose<00:06:23.280> the<00:06:23.440> reading<00:06:24.000> intended

00:06:24.479 --> 00:06:33.360
for<00:06:24.639> them<00:06:24.880> as<00:06:25.039> their<00:06:25.280> own<00:06:25.600> when<00:06:25.840> asked<00:06:26.080> to<00:06:26.160> choose<00:06:26.479> between<00:06:26.800> two<00:06:27.039> readings.<00:06:27.919> This<00:06:28.160> proportion<00:06:28.720> is<00:06:28.960> also<00:06:29.919> statistically<00:06:30.720> significant.<00:06:33.039> These

00:06:33.360 --> 00:06:42.400
readings,<00:06:33.840> as<00:06:34.000> well<00:06:34.240> as<00:06:34.479> previously<00:06:35.039> published<00:06:35.440> data<00:06:35.759> from<00:06:36.080> 16<00:06:36.560> other<00:06:36.800> readings,<00:06:37.520> demonstrate<00:06:38.080> what<00:06:38.319> we<00:06:38.479> call<00:06:38.800> anomalous<00:06:39.440> information<00:06:40.080> reception,<00:06:40.720> or<00:06:40.960> AIR,<00:06:42.160> that

00:06:42.400 --> 00:06:50.880
is,<00:06:42.639> the<00:06:42.800> reporting<00:06:43.280> by<00:06:43.520> mediums<00:06:44.160> of<00:06:44.319> accurate<00:06:44.800> and<00:06:44.960> specific<00:06:45.520> information<00:06:46.160> about<00:06:46.639> the<00:06:46.800> deceased<00:06:47.520> with<00:06:47.759> no<00:06:48.080> prior<00:06:48.479> knowledge,<00:06:49.199> no<00:06:49.440> feedback<00:06:49.919> during<00:06:50.319> or<00:06:50.639> after

00:06:50.880 --> 00:06:58.880
the<00:06:51.039> reading,<00:06:51.759> and<00:06:51.919> without<00:06:52.319> using<00:06:52.639> fraud<00:06:52.960> or<00:06:53.120> deception.<00:06:54.000> However,<00:06:54.639> whether<00:06:54.960> or<00:06:55.120> not<00:06:55.360> this<00:06:55.599> information<00:06:56.080> is<00:06:56.240> coming<00:06:56.639> from<00:06:56.880> the<00:06:57.039> deceased<00:06:57.599> cannot<00:06:57.919> be<00:06:58.080> determined<00:06:58.720> with

00:06:58.880 --> 00:07:08.880
accuracy<00:06:59.520> data<00:07:00.000> alone.<00:07:01.759> We<00:07:02.000> address<00:07:02.400> this<00:07:02.720> with<00:07:02.880> our<00:07:03.120> operation<00:07:03.680> research<00:07:04.160> program,<00:07:04.560> which<00:07:04.800> will<00:07:04.960> be<00:07:05.120> discussed<00:07:05.520> in<00:07:05.680> a<00:07:05.759> future<00:07:06.240> video.<00:07:08.560> Please

00:07:08.880 --> 00:07:11.560
visit

00:07:11.560 --> 00:07:19.759
www.windbridge.org<00:07:12.880> to<00:07:13.039> learn<00:07:13.280> more<00:07:13.520> about<00:07:13.840> Windbridge<00:07:14.240> Research<00:07:14.639> Center<00:07:15.039> research,<00:07:15.840> to<00:07:16.080> access<00:07:16.639> our<00:07:16.800> free<00:07:17.039> educational<00:07:17.680> materials,<00:07:18.319> and<00:07:18.400> to<00:07:18.639> sign<00:07:18.960> up<00:07:19.120> to<00:07:19.280> receive

00:07:19.759 --> 00:07:25.720
our<00:07:19.919> monthly<00:07:20.400> emails.<00:07:21.360> Thank<00:07:23.720> you.

```